Gun Control essay

Gun control relates to set of policies and laws that are enacted to facilitate the regulation of manufacturing, selling, transporting, possessing, or using firearms or guns by civilians. Also, gun control can be termed as firearm regulation as it primarily concerned with restricting and regulating firearms in a state. To ensure that firearms are regulated the majority of countries have put in place guiding policies that govern the use of guns. Typically, gun control doesn’t t restrict all forms of firearms but a particular category in which only authorized personnel are granted access clearance. However, regulating firearms doesn’t guarantee public safety as to some extent they need protection against unseen or sudden risks. Therefore, guns should not be regulated rather civilians should be educated on the benefits of having them and how to use them in an efficient.

The United States constitution documents the bill of rights in the effort to ensure good governance and facilitate democracy. Also, protection of these rights ensures the safety of citizens against oppression by the government. Therefore, the government should ensure that constitutional rights are adhered to and observed at all times. This is to ensure that civilians are safe and secure at all-time by providing them with firearms to ensure their safety (Gottfried, 1993). Thus, by controlling and regulating firearms in America, it is an indication of violation of human rights as these subjects’ civilians to imminent danger and also the denial of freedom.

Among the right documented in the constitution is the right to own property. This is an indication that American citizens have a legal right to own property in which firearms can be considered a property. This is an indication that controlling guns violates the constitutions and infringes on the rights of the American citizens. The constitutional right is enacted to facilitate effective governing of a state and thus by violating these laws, it reflects poor governance and violation of human rights.  Therefore, the constitution should be respected to ensure it serves its purpose and should not be violated at any particular time rather amendments should be made.  Additionally, prohibiting guns violates the right to freedom of expression and ownership of property which in return gives few individuals power over others. By restricting firearms in the American society goes against the law enacted to govern the state. Though these there is a decline in democracy and thus reflect unconstitutional endeavors with the state. As stated in the constitution citizens’ rights should be adhered to and their violation should be subject to the necessary action as directed by the law. However, gun control goes against these rights and thus it should be avoided unless they are amended.

Notably, there many risks associated with civilians possessing firearms in their home and even carrying them around. According to (Gottfried, 1993) manufacturing and selling of guns poses a great risk to the American society at large.  This is evident as there are many examples of criminal cases involving the use of guns in the United States However, it is also stated in the constitution how firearms should be handled and the consequences of mismanagement or using them for the wrong purpose. Therefore, the government should not restrict guns in the united states rather it should ensure rules governing the use of firearms are obeyed and necessary action is taken when violated.

In addition, possessing firearms through the right and constitutional procedure provide comprehensive and detailed information in respect to who owns a firearm within a particular neighborhood. Through this in case of any criminal activities involving the use of guns individuals responsible can be easily tracked and held accountable. This facilitates accountability and transparency within the states government and the society at large. Therefore, the government should advocate gun ownership across the entire state to ensure that all guns are legally owned and licensed instead of restricting them.

Also, the constitution clearly stipulates how firearms should be owned and the criteria to be followed in issuing them. This is an indicator that the constitution is precise on gun possession and ownership. Therefore, the state should ensure that the even the government abide by the laws enacted to govern the society at large. Through this democracy will be enhanced which will facilitate constitutional rights. Therefore, disagreeing in to respect to gun control since it is a violation of human rights and non-democratic acts.

Besides the negative aspect associated with guns in the American society they also have significant benefits which cannot be overlooked. Agreeing with the state on the risks caused by the possession and use of guns there are also crucial to the individual’s safety as well as the society at large. According to (Johnson, 2017), the state is responsible for the safety of its citizen and thus it should embrace all means possible to ensure their protection. However, it is documented in the constitution on how gun-related offense should be handled and the charges depending with the crime and its magnitude.

One of the rights guaranteed by the American constitution is the right to own and operate a firearm. This is supported by the second amendment which states that citizens a have the freedom of right to bear arms (Bakal, 1966). The amendment was enacted in the effort to keep and maintain a safe and secure environment for the Americans. According to the constitution, the right to bear arms should not be infringed and if so it is subject to a lawful action. Thus, gun control goes against the second amendment of the constitution which is clearly stated that is not subject to infringement.

Gun control is typically unconstitutional since it infringes rights and violates the different privileges, laws and immunity clauses. This is an indicator that by regulating guns makes gun ownership inconvenient which or rather impossible thereby violating the right to bear arms as documented in the constitution (Larson, 2018). Also, makes it bring about confusion to patriotic citizens who abide by the law through violation of the due clause. Patriotism is a key element which most of the states in the world look forward to achieving. Therefore, by restricting guns it reflects poor governance and unconstitutional actions as it goes against the state laws in respect to the right to own and bear firearms.

Basically, the constitution is made of laws which are enacted by public representative which are aimed to govern a state and individuals residing in it. However, with the attempt or the gun control ideology it clear that laws enacted can be infringed or rather violated. By controlling gun is reflects the government undemocratic actions in determining which laws should be followed and which are subject to violation. Though this, citizens are also encouraged not follow state laws since by enforcing gun control it goes against the law (Busch, 2003). Therefore, to set a good example to citizen’s guns should not be restricted as assign of respect to the constitutional rights.

Further, violating any constitutional rights should be subject to appeal in the court of law or to any other judicial system. If the restrictions are to be in place the issue should be addressed in a court of law to ensure justice is served. Also, civilian’s involvement is key to ensure good governance and democracy in a state.  Through this individuals will have a chance to contribute and share their thought on the issue and explain their views in relation to gun control. Therefore, civilians should also be a part of decisions making process in respect to issues cornering them and also to facilitate democracy.

In the second amendment of the constitution which was enacted in respect to firearms possession within the different state. Different states are subjected to distinct laws governing the use of guns depending with considerable factors. However, consideration relating to other measures towards gun control should be taken to avoid restricting gun. This is because, besides the amendment legality on different gun law, all the states are subjected to the same constitution which promulgated a robust bill of rights. Therefore, amendments should be made and passed to ensure effective use of firearms in different states.

Federal appeal courts should ensure that issues presented to them are judged with the utmost integrity and in accordance with the law. Also, they should ensure that justice is served for all despite their social class and political differences. Facts should be put into considerations and compared to real life situation if any action was to taken. For example, banning guns in a high crime neighborhood is essential to minimize crimes but at the same time, it puts other living in those neighborhoods at great risk (Palazzolo, 2016). Therefore, serious consideration should be put to ensure that all civilians all safe and free from any danger hence restricting firearms is not justice to all.

Thus the government and law bodies should ensure equality and equity in all states as a way of avoiding or doing away with discrimination. By ensuring that all civilians fully enjoy their rights and freedom to own guns it reflects an open government as dictated by the constitution. Therefore, gun control policies should not be put in place in the effort to enhance the safety in all civilizations and avoid favors of particular regions. Thus, control on firearms should not be enacted in any state to ensure standardization and freedom of arms is achieved.

Much focus should be placed on licensing firearms and retrieving unlicensed guns to ensure that there are order and partial control. Also, before s gun is issued the government should ensure the individuals who possess a firearm are of sound mind. Though this they can prevent unnecessary risks and insane people getting a gun. This can reduce gun irregularities to a great depth and ensure that guns are used by right-minded people for the right reasons. Therefore, instead of restricting guns, encouragement to own at least one should be advocated to ensure all firearm possessed ar legal and registered. In that in case they are used to commit a crime they can be traced and the owner held accountable.

In summation, gun control should not be enforced within the American civilization and this will undermine the security of civilizations. Also, it is against the constitution as it allows citizens to own an arm thus restricting them violates these rights.  However, Instead of regulating guns the government should initiate educational programs to ensure that civilians understand how and when to use a gun. Through this, they can minimize criminal or immorality to a great extent. Therefore, gun control is not a remedy to the problems experienced due to possession of arms rather it is a problem on it own as subjects civilization different kind of risk which they can’t protect themselves from without firearms.