Hypothesis 1: Lack of Customer Service Efficiency is directly correlated to the declining sales of Apple Inc.
The first hypothesis created the assumption that company sales are interdependent with the before and after-sale customer service. Therefore, in-depth research was conducted to determine the verity of the assumption and support or disapprove the correlation in equal measures. The rate of customer service efficiency was rated on the grounds of how the company handles after-sale services its customers, and also how the customer service team responds to customer needs. Even though there has been an age-old notion regarding the fact at hand, research revealed that there is just but a trace of correlation between Apple company sales and customer service efficiency (Vallaster, 512). Therefore, the findings automatically dismissed the postulation that there is a correlation between company sales and customer service efficiency regarding Apple Inc. The findings, however, state that despite the minimal effect of the relationship, there is a danger decline in sales resulting from poor customer service on large scale parameters. Evidence can be drawn from the perception of a customer, by default, influences the picture that would be painted about a product. Therefore, as per the findings, customer service efficiency has little to no effect on sales in Apple Inc.
Hypothesis 2: technology innovation is directly linked to the company sales for Apple Inc.
Technology innovation serves a pivotal role in the growth of a business. The benefits of technological innovations are as follows but not limited to, improving sales, reduction of waste, and saving on the cost of production as well as boosting market positioning. That notwithstanding, the research data indicated close to zero correlation between technology innovation and company stock prices concerning Apple Inc. The data showed that r= 0.00= 0, asserting that there was no correlation between the stated variable in the hypothesis. As such, the data collected disproves the assumption that there is a correlation between the art of technology innovation and company sale with a focus on Apple Inc. The factor is attributed to the fact that Apple has been at the forefront in developing newer technologies that are by far incomparable to other companies (Santana, Valle, and Galan, 213). The company has been known for its top-notch software and application designs. The innovations have been known to surprise the competitors and the world at large. Nonetheless, the majority of customers have branded Apple Inc. as an average entity. The sentiments were unanimous despite the technological advancement exhibited by Apple Inc.
Hypothesis 3: The ease of use is directly linked to company sales of Apple Inc.
The ease of use is often deemed as the difference between the success and failure of a product. The selling point always lies in the simplicity of the use of the product. Hitherto, ease of use serves several benefits to companies that administer the model. Firstly, keeping in mind that a product only gets once chance to make the first impression, the ease of use model, in this case, wins the day. Secondly, the ease of use automatically implies a reduction in support cost and therefore maximizing on company profits.
Additionally, an application that has encompassed ease of use approach quickly gets referrals to colleagues and friends by the users who first access the product. What is more is that, if a company employs the ease of use model in product creation, there shall be an automatic simulation of traffic lined up to purchase the product hence increasing company sells. Basing on the data that was collected, it indicates that the ease of use model has a direct correlation with the company sales. As such, the complex nature of Apple gadgets has contributed to the decline in sales.