Impact of neuroscience on cognitive psychology
Neuroscience presents a well-integrated system where it is possible to help in maintaining an improved commitment to change. Cognitive psychology offers a focus on the ability of an individual to make an informed decision by engaging different aspects of cognitive wellbeing. The mind plays a central role in the activities that we undertake. Thus it is crucial to help outline a different level functionality within which it is easier to identify positive changes (Wood et al., 2016). Cognitive neuroscience investigates various aspects of cognition, including perception, attention, language, memory, decision and problem-solving. Decision making and problem-solving are essential aspects that help maintain a positive platform within which it is possible to make an informed decision (Wulf & Lewthwaite, 2016). Solving conflicts and decision making require a strong assessment of the issues presented, which are essential in defining favourable outcomes.
Impacts of neuroscience on social change
Neuroscience provides an improved assessment within which it is easier to make a decision. Building a strong change process presents a highly successful system within which makes the right decision can be attained (Sahakian et al., 2015). There are different components that are investigated which defining individual decision making. Therefore different individuals have a different level of consideration on better processes which identify the underlying concerns. Attention and perception define the ability of an individual to internalize and visualize a given issue and make the best decision. Critical thinking involved perception and attention, which are aspects of cognition that help in individual wellbeing. Attention includes a selective response to a given issue while perception is based on how an individual considers a given issue which is influenced by attention (Unsworth & Robison, 2016). Lower attention to a given issue is associated with poor perception. Thus to make a decision, it is crucial to think critically and ensure that there is the integration of better processes which can be undertaken to attain the desired outcomes.
Research question
Does attention influence performance?
This question provides an understanding of whether the individual level of attention can influence their performance. Attention in this case assesses the work of the memory. At the same time, the performance focuses on individual mind and intelligence, which present a strong focus on individual wellbeing, especially concerning cognition.
Methods
The effective methods that could be integrated into this case involve experimental design where there is an assessment of individual attention level based on memory assessment as well as their performance based on how they perform in a given test (Gobbo & Louzã, 2014). Thus, there is a greater focus on a controlled and experimental group from which the findings will help create a positive system for improved commitment to successful outcomes. Analysis of variance could be used in heling understand whether there is a difference in performance in both controlled and experimental groups that are investigated (Nunez et al., 2015). The decisions that are undertaken in this case present a well-defined context within which better decisions can be undertaken to improve the findings as obtained in the study. Analysis, interpretation, inference, evaluation, explanation and self-regulation are vital aspects that need to be fully considered in creating an enabling environment for better decision making through critical thinking.
References
Gobbo, M. A., & Louzã, M. R. (2014). Influence of stimulant and non-stimulant drug treatment on driving performance in patients with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder: a systematic review. European Neuropsychopharmacology, 24(9), 1425-1443.
Nunez, M. D., Srinivasan, R., & Vandekerckhove, J. (2015). Individual differences in attention influence perceptual decision making. Frontiers in psychology, 6, 18.
Sahakian, B. J., Bruhl, A. B., Cook, J., Killikelly, C., Savulich, G., Piercy, T., … & Jones, P. B. (2015). The impact of neuroscience on society: cognitive enhancement in neuropsychiatric disorders and in healthy people. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 370(1677), 20140214.
Unsworth, N., & Robison, M. K. (2016). The influence of lapses of attention on working memory capacity. Memory & Cognition, 44(2), 188-196.
Wood, G., Vine, S. J., & Wilson, M. R. (2016). Working memory capacity-controlled attention and aiming performance under pressure. Psychological Research, 80(4), 510-517.
Wulf, G., & Lewthwaite, R. (2016). Optimizing performance through intrinsic motivation and attention for learning: The OPTIMAL theory of motor learning. Psychonomic bulletin & review, 23(5), 1382-1414.