IMPERIALISM AND INDUSTRIALIZATION SINCE 1750
During the 19th century in Europe, the political and the financial forces of the world dramatically changed the European continent in a way that altered the nation and the lives of the people. It took less than a century for the absolutist standards of the old administration to shrivel away as most people thought of freedom and democracy of their nations. Revolutionists and imperialists took over all the Europe, fueled by industrialization and powerful economic connection by the advancement of social endeavor to cater for the welfare of the people. Additionally, the supporter of independence sentiment and imperialism increased the changes in the nation by escalating racism and the competition between different classes of people[1]. As this research paper seek out to display, however, rebellion, industrialization and imperialism had no stable and reliable pattern. Mostly, they differed considerably depending on the nation and the people that took part in the progression from 1750 up to now. Therefore the transformation witnessed in the world, due to changes in the imperialists and industrialization increased a lot of conflicts across the globe. Don't use plagiarised sources.Get your custom essay just from $11/page
Before the nineteenth century, different nations established their territories in Africa due to imperialism and industrialization. They penetrated into the inland into the African societies and tried to manipulate their ways of living. Such situation led to a lot of conflicts since most of the people resisted the newly introduced culture[2]. Before that period, the effects of the European nations were demonstrated through the commerce of slaves, ivory and other commodities that most of the Africans did not also champion. It influenced, but did not establish the political and the economic structures of the communities.
In the late nineteenth century, there were self-intentionally interventionists. Immediately after the industrial revolution kicked off, there was the advancement of technology and the military enhanced European elites on an idea on the way to suppress the Africans for their personal economic, political and social gains. The African continent became an object of reformist imperialism since it could be viewed as slavery continent and an isolated place where everyone could benefit from matters of commerce[3]. The Europeans took advantage of the continent that had not developed or realize a lot of revolutions going on across the globe.
The type of the European imperialism, later on, changed the entity of assessment since they took advantage of the African nation. Africans on the other, hand thought it was exploitation expounding their conflict with the Europeans. They derived most of their powers and advanced their superiority so that they would control the African market and anything that African owned[4]. They believed that the Africans had no power and the ability to control their continent. They did not have the righteousness of self-rule, and therefore, colonization would be the best idea. However, Africans resisted all the exploitation and the critic of imperialists who doubted their endeavors.
The concern about imperialism tackled political theorists with paramount questions about Europe itself. J.A Hobson a British Liberal saw empire as an outcome of the underutilization in the modern economic sector. He stated that by lowering the wages of the workers increased market and increased production and domestic markets that would help in growing economy of many nations across the globe. However, most of the countries were rigidity and did not want to absorb their expanding capacity. They believed that there was also of exploitation that they would face from such people[5]. Since most of the nations resisted, capitalists turned to their different administration to safeguard their new markets and preserve the privileges to gain admittance to resources that resulted to the competition over the foreign that brought a lot of conflict between the natives and the foreigners.
There were different ways in which imperialism and industrialization enhanced growth and developments in many nations. They both had some familiar and distinct features. For example, the industrial revolution made imperialism more critical. Additionally, it was the primary factor that enhanced hegemony. The industrial revolution improved a situation whereby, the European nations, Japan and the United States required vast empires. They needed the realms for two different reasons[6]. Firstly, they demanded places where they would get raw materials for their industries. Therefore, imperialism was identified as the most strategic method to get those materials. Secondly, they felt that they required captive market where they would sell their commodities in the companies and imperial possession would be the best method.
The industrial revolution assisted many nations to take and sustain empires. It substantially increased the strength of the military. It gave them advanced weapons to fight in the wars and ships that could reach different parts of the world faster and dependably more than the sailing vessels before the industrialization era[7]. Such advancement made it easier for the Europeans to reach various parts of the world and conquer the place they secured. In such a situation, both the industrial revolution and imperialism are related since they worked on the same basis and for the same purpose and enhanced each other.
The industrial revolution changed the nature of colonialism when it started in Great Britain at the start of the 18th century. It kicked off at a time when European imperialism in the contemporary world and the other places such as the coasts of Africa and Asia were still underway. The industrial revolution had initially focused on commerce in most parts of Africa and Asia. However, it increased productivity in the industrialized places leading to an urge for more raw materials for their industries to enhance the technological capacity. In the situation, Great Britain required natural materials such as cotton to maintain their texture mills operating. British took over India, Egypt and other nations due to the need for cotton.
Imperialism and industrialization cause a lot of international tension, both between the empires and between themselves. For instance, imperialism and imperial contention provided the grounds and challenge for World War I. Imperialism is a strategy where a prevailing country manipulates and exploits one of many colonies. There was a lot of tension in most parts of the world since Great Britain occupied almost a quarter of the world. Even though some nations were acquired through easy ways, there were others that required little more difficulty, meaning that there could be conflicts between the countries[8]. The British imperialists had the aim of expanding their businesses, and they never agreed with the locals, something that created a lot of hostility and conflicts in nations that they visited.
The scramble for Africa also sparked some diplomatic incidences, though they were followed by a lot of global tension. However, there was the involvement of subtle frequencies. Two crises stemmed from Morocco in North-West Africa. Also thought it was not a colony of French, it was situated within France’s locality and the sphere of authority. Paris had already started to establish a protectorate in the nation, and afterward, German Kaiser intervenes the situation. It created a lot of tension and sometimes later in 1905 Wilhelm II went to Morocco where he went to the city of Tangier and delivered a speech and declared Morocco independence. The antagonism of the French administration increased since most of the Africans believe that the French had come to take away their belongings. There was also a second crisis that came into existence in 1911[9]. The French were trying to suppress a revolt in Morocco, and the Germans got armed vessel a situation that triggered an international tension. Additionally, there was also imperial instability that brought about tensions. Critical predicaments in the Ottoman Empire influenced the balance of superiority in the Eastern Europe as compared to other parts of the world.
In general, the era of industrialization and imperialism starting from 1750 was a developing time especially in the European power in the domination of the whole world. There was industrialization that enhanced unprecedented wealth and contemporary western political ideologies initiated strong and stabilized countries around the world. Moreover, the new doctrines increased nationalism among different countries. The patriotism in different nations increased nations assisting people to dominate various sectors be it industries or any other industry. There was also an intensification of worldwide power, riches competition, and tensions that in different countries across the globe. For instance, in 1914 there existed conflicts that brought about the Great War that came into being in the 20th century a malpractice that not many people expected.
Bibliography
Abel, Christopher, and Colin M. Lewis, eds. Latin America, economic imperialism and the state: the political economy of the external connection from independence to the present. Bloomsbury Publishing, 2015.
Chien, Vincent. “To House a Moor and End a Marsh: Jane and Imperialism through Liminal and Structural Processes in Jane Eyre.” 2014 NCUR (2014).
Ortiz, Roberto José. “Agro-industrialization, petrodollar illusions and the transformation of the capitalist world economy in the 1970s: The Latin American experience.” Critical Sociology 42, no. 4-5 (2016): 599-621.
[1] Ortiz, Roberto José. “Agro-industrialization, petrodollar illusions and the transformation of the capitalist world economy in the 1970s: The Latin American experience.” Critical Sociology 42, no. 4-5 (2016): 599-621.
[2] Chien, Vincent. “To House a Moor and End a Marsh: Jane and Imperialism through Liminal and Structural Processes in Jane Eyre.” 2014 NCUR (2014).
[3] Abel, Christopher, and Colin M. Lewis, eds. Latin America, economic imperialism and the state: the political economy of the external connection from independence to the present. Bloomsbury Publishing, 2015.
[4] Abel, Christopher, and Colin M. Lewis, eds. Latin America, economic imperialism and the state: the political economy of the external connection from independence to the present. Bloomsbury Publishing, 2015.
[5] Chien, Vincent. “To House a Moor and End a Marsh: Jane and Imperialism through Liminal and Structural Processes in Jane Eyre.” 2014 NCUR (2014).
[6] Ortiz, Roberto José. “Agro-industrialization, petrodollar illusions and the transformation of the capitalist world economy in the 1970s: The Latin American experience.” Critical Sociology 42, no. 4-5 (2016): 599-621.
[7] Abel, Christopher, and Colin M. Lewis, eds. Latin America, economic imperialism and the state: the political economy of the external connection from independence to the present. Bloomsbury Publishing, 2015.
[8] Abel, Christopher, and Colin M. Lewis, eds. Latin America, economic imperialism and the state: the political economy of the external connection from independence to the present. Bloomsbury Publishing, 2015.
[9] Ortiz, Roberto José. “Agro-industrialization, petrodollar illusions and the transformation of the capitalist world economy in the 1970s: The Latin American experience.” Critical Sociology 42, no. 4-5 (2016): 599-621.