In your view, does utilitarianism provide a more objective standard for determining right and wrong than moral rights do? Explain your answer fully. Does utilitarianism provide a more objective standard than principles of justice? Explain.
Utilitarianism is a utilitarian ethical philosophy that positions the locus of right and wrong exclusively on the result (consequences) of preferring one action or policy over specific actions or policies (Mulgan, 2014). As such, it goes beyond the limits of one’s desires and takes into consideration the needs of others. While moral rights, the laws developed for creators of copyrighted works that are widely known in civil legislation jurisdiction and some standard code to some extent. Utilitarianism provides a more objective standard for estimating right and wrong more than moral right and principles of justice because, according to the approach, one of the fundamental insights facilitating the theory is that morally upright behaviors are not harmful to others and the doer too.
And instead of causing more pain, it increases the utility or happiness in other words. Moreover, some of its principles also provide more background on why the theory has more objective standards because one of its core principles is that happiness and pleasure is the one thing that genuinely has intrinsic value. Something with inherent value means that it is also good itself, and the world that experiences this theory is way better than a state without (Mill, 2016). What sets apart utilitarianism from others from other sources such as moral rights and principles of justice is that it cultivates intrinsic value instead of instrumental value. Another policy of the theory explains that actions are right if they promote happiness, and when they are wrong actions, they lead to unhappiness. It is better to leave the morality of an action to decide its consequences.
References
Mill, J. S. (2016). Utilitarianism. In Seven masterpieces of philosophy (pp. 337-383). Routledge.
Mulgan, T. (2014). Understanding utilitarianism. Routledge.