Integrating Disciplinary Contributions to Achieve Community Resilience
Assessing my community’s interdisciplinary approach
My town has taken quite significant steps to enhance resilience. The society has well-integrated reliance goals that relate to fire outbreak, tornadoes, and earthquakes. However, the community has been much prepared for fire response by having a well-versed team in the frontline. The flatness of my community exposes it to tornado effects than earthquakes as we are farther from the seismic zone. A group of scientists is engineers work together to reduce tornado effects by having a significant sound generation-meter to reduce tornado effects. The scientific response has entirely worked since a huge sound wave minimizes the intensity of tornado (Rachel, 2015). The infrastructural development inroads are evident to allow faster communication and movement of people. Hospitals have also been set in place away in case of occurrence. Robust construction is a huge roof that is evident in my community that works to reduce the effects of wind. Generally, my neighborhood is well-prepared to increase resilience to natural hazards.
Preventive Measures by leaders of Centerville
Increasing resilience of Centerville will inculcate having in place vast sound waves, which can reduce the impact of a tornado during expectation. The leaders of Centerville should put in place response teams that work to educate members of precautionary measures during a storm. The town should improve communication networks in the form of radios and televisions that inform people of any expectation regarding hurricane and earthquake (Ellingwood et al., 2016). Builders in the city should build houses in the town bearing strong walls and having all the precautionary measures. Bracing garage doors and the installation of wind resistant roofs should be apparent in Centerville. The safer structures in Centerville will help to make residents resilient to earthquakes and tornadoes.. Don't use plagiarised sources.Get your custom essay just from $11/page
Community resilience Response
The community resilience evaluation summary is ideal in stepwise from resilience goals, the current state of resilience, gap prioritization, and action selection. The setting of resilience goals is the most significant first step in evaluating the needs of a community. It exposes the dangers the population is exposed to depending on the positioning. For instance, a town in a flat area will be more prone to tornadoes than the other. Evaluation of the current step works to make the community identify their unprepared areas. Prioritization of the identified risks depends on the degree of danger expected (Ceskavich & Sasani, 2018). The city should prioritize the hazards that may result in higher fatalities than one with lesser. The mitigation process will further work to reduce the severity of the problem. Generally, the response preparedness of such a community is ideal for increasing its resilience.
Economic steps by the state government to reduce Covid-19 effects
The reduction of economic impacts will enhance care for employers and employees by the state government. Therefore, the state has financial goals of caring for the manufacturers, employees, and consumers. Reducing direct taxes on companies will ensure that organizations save much required to retain their employees (Ceskavich & Sasani, 2018). In this case, the state government will reduce tax levy on firms to ensure that they maintain their employees. Government subsidy on basic needs such as foods will also play a central role in protecting product consumers. The subsidy can take place by reducing the value-added tax on each commodity. For instance, prices of milk can undergo indirect tax reduction to save consumers from exploitation during this time. The state government, in this case, will serve to protects laying off staff only to benefit later after pandemic through taxation.
References
Ceskavich, R., &Sasani, M. (2018). Methodology for evaluating community resilience. Natural
Hazards Review, 19(1), 04017021.
Ellingwood, B.; Cutler, H.; Gardoni, P.; Peacock, W.; Van De Lindt, J. & Wang, N. (2016) The
Centerville Virtual Community: a fully integrated decision model of interacting physical and social infrastructure systems, Sustainable and Resilient Infrastructure, 1:3-4, 95-107, DOI: 10.1080/23789689.2016.1255000.
Rachel A. Davidson (2015) Integrating Disciplinary Contributions to Achieve Community
Resilience to Natural Disasters, Civil Engineering, and Environmental Systems, 32:1-2, 55-67, DOI: 10.1080/10286608.2015.1011627