international human right monitory

international human right monitory

1. There are two different types of international human right monitory, namely, treaty-based and non-treaty based mechanism. Treaty-based are preserved in legally binding human rights conventions. Non-treaty based mechanism not centred on lawfully binding human rights treaty commitment.
2. Human rights monitory is an action that tries to find information about the condition of human rights in a country to involve advocacy to address human right violation (Gordon, 2017). It comprises the process of documenting human rights violations for the information to be classified and used efficiently.
3. Human rights are rights essential to all human beings irrespective of gender, religion, race, and ethnicity (Gordon, 2017). They include the right to life, right to work and education, freedom of expression and freedom from slavery. The notion of human rights developed stronger after world war II (Gordon, 2017). The United Nations was then established, and human rights were later apprehended during President Franklin Delano union address. Globally the campaigners of human rights have mostly been citizens. Non-governmental organizations have always played a key role in directing the international community on human rights issues. After the universal declaration of human rights, non-governmental organizations started emerging.

Non-governmental organizations ever since started being on the forefront to enforce human rights in governments and ensure citizens understood their rights (Gordon, 2017). The nature of their operations recognizes these organizations: global rights, UN watch, international federation for human rights, human rights foundation, human rights first, among many others.

5. The universality of human rights is the rights every human has because they are human, and they are equal rights, which are held universally by all human beings. Relative universality is the idea that human rights have multiple and diverse foundations influenced by culture, nationality and religion (Gordon, 2017). Although more emphasis promoted by culture limits the universality of human rights.
6. The universal declaration of human rights is the underpinning of international human rights law implemented in 1948 (Burke, Roland, and James Kirby, 2018). It represents the universal acknowledgement that fundamental rights and essential freedoms are integral to all human beings, immutable and equally appropriate to everyone, and that everyone is instinctively free and equal in self-respect and rights regardless of race, religion, ethnic origin, nationality and place of residence.

Short Essay

The question of indivisibility of human rights originated in the argumentative discussion, surrounding the translation of the universal declaration of human rights into obligatory treaty law as two separate covenants on human rights (Burke, Roland, and James Kirby, 2018). The oratory of indivisibility has frequently been used to advance that have a political end that has nothing or little to do with promoting the rights of individuals.

A state foreign policy entails the strategies it uses to defend its international and domestic interests and decides the way it interrelates with other states and non-state actors (Kamminga, 2017). The main drive of foreign policy is to protect a nation’s interests, which can be peaceful or violent.

Several foreign policy theories explain the reasons behind how states act. The fundamental opinions are realism; the interest of the states is manipulated by power and states’ interest comes first. Liberalism supports equality and freedom in all areas, and the needs of the citizens come first and are superior (Kamminga, 2017). Where else in economic structuralism is the exploitation of masses by a few individuals. This theory is practiced in most countries. Then with the psychological approach is the ability of an individual’s psychology can affect foreign policy decisions.

Finally, constructivism suggests that if a system should be corrected or altered with social mobility can bring about amendments (Kamminga, 2017). In most cases where human rights override a foreign policy, some theories help change the system like constructivism. Where one becomes a foreign policy decision-maker, it’s always possible to fall on the side of the policies given that one is there to enforce them. In the case of a human rights advocate, the duty is to ensure human rights are not violated, and the theory of liberalism applies well. However, the CEO of a multinational company will be required to balance both the foreign policy and human rights. Finally, as global citizens, human rights have a more positive effect, and if not fully reign forced, then the foreign policy is of no use to an individual. Therefore human rights are more to an individual while foreign policy affects the state more.

Works Cited

Burke, Roland, and James Kirby. “The Universal Declaration of Human Rights: Politics and Provisions (1945–1948).” (2018).

Gordon, Joy. “The Concept of Human Rights: The History and Meaning of its Politicization.” Human Rights. Routledge, 2017.

Kamminga, MennoT, ed. Challenges in International Human Rights Law. Vol. 3. Routledge, 2017.