Interviewing Children

Interviewing Children

It is worth indicating that the process engaged for children to expound on something they observe towards the interviewer is presented in a dynamic manner. Therefore, it can be developed that experiments indicating children’s experimental designs used to discover the ability to transmit the information given by the children. Therefore, the interviewer initiated in drawing the geometrical shapes. The instincts developed by children through the drawing designs of the shaped revealed diverse thoughts of the drawings (Poole, 2016). It is indicated interviewing of children reveals on the degree and capacity to expound on something they have heard or seen. The child and the interviewer are brought to have a specific relationship, especially in the process of getting information from them. The target experience is likely to have diverse changes and effects on the individuals as they develop information and communicate it to be transcribed.

Cooperative behavior reveals the tendency of the children to respond to questions. In the dynamics of interviewing, it is worth associating children with the capacity to answer every question that is asked in the interviews. They also appropriately provide information about certain critical issues without developing questions on it. Hence, the effectiveness and efficiency in the answers provided are appropriate according to the study on the dynamics of interviewing.  However, language confusions are indicated to affect the information provided. Therefore, it is brought that errors in communication among kids are automatic (Poole, 2016). It can also be developed that children in most cases are affected by the confusion in language and end up proving wrong answers without discovering. Insufficient attention is obtained from the confusions in the language used in the interviewing. Misinterpretation of the questions through the communications also affects the results of the interview.

Memory intrusions affect the information obtained from the interviews reveal on the complexities that children go through. Moreover, the difficulty of associating the information from different memories and relate it together is probable. Children have issues with updating the memories as a result of different concentrations on events.  Moreover, source monitoring errors impact the interviewing process through averting the concentration hence, leading to wrong projection in the information obtained. Confabulation is also developed to affect interviewing relations, especially in the damage of the parts of the brain. The frontal lobe that is associated with memories has a major impact on the development of the answering process. Hence, the target experiences that reveal on confabulation are likely to indicate the memory disturbances that vary within an individual. Hence, it is stated that these are most likely to affect the outcome expected during the interview.

The child’s abilities and limitations are also brought to have an impact on the dynamics of the interviewing process. For instance, the relationship between the interviewer and the child depends on the specific abilities that are portrayed by the child. For instance, in certain circumstances, children that develop fear and fright to getting troubled effect the information developed in an interview. The children are likely to get confused and engage in lies to protect themselves from punishment. Moreover, the fear affects the development of connection and blending of various memories hence, revealing the difficulty of developing a closer relationship during interviewing. Hence, fear is a limitation of the process. Inhabited temperaments further limit the process of obtaining information from children through a series of questions developed. In such circumstances, the dynamics of interviewing build on the freezing of children, especially among individuals with scary faces and novel situations. Hence, it is right to depict that such instances and children’s abilities that are a limited impact on interviewing the child.

Experiences such as normal memory lapses have a consequence in developing relationships between interviewers and children. In some instances, memory lapses have a capacity to happen when concentration is focused on a certain part of the brain. In such instances, it can be mentioned that children have difficulty in being developed as an eye witness. They lack the ability of reliability and strength of blending the memories to be engaged in the conversations that are developed.  The insufficient effort, especially among interviewers, contributes to obtaining limited information (Poole, 2016). Therefore, it can be illustrated that the limitation of effort insufficiency is portrayed in the conversation affects the content delivered in the dynamics of interviews. Additionally, the poor relationship between the interviewer and the kid affects the manner in which the conversation is controlled, limiting the children’s participation.

The development of the ability among children to indicate the provision of information during interviewing is based on the blending of memories. In such situations, it is worth depicting that children should be limited from the fear and temperament behaviors that can affect their development of ideas. The abilities of children, as revealed in the elements of the dynamic interviewing, reveal the diversity to expound on the various information and respond to each question cooperatively (Poole, 2016). Children in the process of interviewing have the capacity to develop extensive abilities to promote communication and answer the question in the interview. It is established that their capacity to demonstrate tasks can be compared to the conversations. In such cases, they fail in interviews but perform in the demonstrations. Their abilities in mastery and memorization of words are also associated with the dynamics of interviews.

References

Poole, D. A. (2016). Interviewing Children: The Science of Conversation in Forensic Contexts.

American Psychological Association, Washington D.C. Pp. 1-15.