Interviewing prisoners

Interviewing prisoners

Question 1

Interviewing prisoners at times can be viewed as a research process. The essence of interviewing convicts can be to ascertain some facts which have been kept surreptitious. In such an instance, confidentially matters. In research, most human subjects should be collected, and the consent agreement form be signed. For that matter, the answers provided by the prisoners shall remain anonymous without revealing the source. Confidentiality maintenance is an essential measure in ensuring that that private information is safeguarded at all the cost (Bansal et al. 15). Thus, in a case where prisoners commence narrating how a guard sells drugs to the convict would be treated with utmost care. However, the identity of the convict would never be revealed, but further probe needs to be conducted to verify such facts provided. The narration should be given to the management without naming the narrator or pointing out the name of the guard involved in the act. After the interview, recommendations should be made to the administration to carry out further investigation to verify the claims which have been revealed during the meetings.

Question 2

Addressing problems in society is vital since several people would attempt to get solutions to various challenges experienced. However, multiple predicaments are highly politicized, such as that commencing to getting their answers to become a hard-nut -to crack. In addressing issues revolving around politically polarized bureau of alcohol, tobacco, firearms, and explosives, there are approaches which should be followed to ensure success. These include:

Transparent communication- to effectively solve a problem, open communication is needed in which each person’s points and concerns expressed freely.  Communication is a necessity for addressing the pertinent issue. The connection makes those involved in a predicament to express themselves. Thus, operational communication towards a plight assists in arriving at the solutions since it opens the dialogue between the troubling factions.

Open-minded – solving a problem concerns with individuals working together towards making a society fit and habitable. For that matter,  getting solutions to the highly politicized bureau of alcohol, tobacco, firearms, and explosives, all the departing factions must be open-minded. Open-minded individuals can hold sober debates and attain amicable solutions to their problems. An open-minded person articulates facts coherently, leading to lasting solutions to issues affecting a society (Drinka & Yen 10).

Robust foundational strategy- when there is no proper strategy, no evolution can take place. A robust strategy has to be implemented to solve any predicament. It is imperative to cognize dissecting a difficulty in place of recognizing change strategy, which is utterly lying within the precincts of such a problem.  It is significant to solve the predicament by knowing ways to collect the right persons, budgets, resources as well as acquaintances from the previous experiences. Such things get to inspire people in lifting their games through making problems solved in collaborative ways. It is a chance of getting individuals closer together.

Question 3

In an event, one faces a hard situation or problem; some people tend to forget techniques or procedures. People often end issues they have at hand, thus approaching their predicaments too impatiently otherwise erroneously. It makes matters being solved harder to tackle as well as getting the wrong solutions to the problems. In the case of OP professor, preparing the students to learn various practices and principles of OP is paramount to his reaching career. Thus, he should strive to make his classes as enjoyable as possible. In checking whether the course redesign is requisite, then one would approach such a problem in the following ways:

Pros/Cons-when one has a particular notion in mind, and it is essential to assess such ideas. For course redesigning, the professor should have his view evaluated and get to know the pros and cons of redesigning the whole course. Through using positives and negatives approach is effective in getting to know things on the ground. Possible merits and demerits should be listed to which side weighs the other (Donaldson 43).

Building plan of action- upon doing a thorough assessment of the solutions to undertake, it is imperative to commence putting up an action plan. Action plans for redesigning a course should be put in writing. It is sufficient to plan all the things which are to be executed mentally. It is similarly essential to be ready to defeat all the predicaments which may come by during the time of course redesigning.

Take action- appropriate actions should be taken as one hopes for the best to happen.

Question 4

The most baffling and recalcitrant problem among the corporate executives is employees resisting change in an organization. Change resistance might take various forms. These include sullen hostility, chronic quarrels, an increasing number of quits, and more requests on transfers as well as continuous output reduction. Change resistance, even the petty forms, might be troublesome to an organization. Having been hired to perform teambuilding intervention for all the employees is the significant step where a small theme park in Orlando wants to practice to promote the productivity and efficiency of its workers. However, one of the departmental managers appears to be resisting such a change issue that has been brought at the doorstep of the company.  The manager maintains the mentality that everything in the company is just okay, and the status quo should be maintained even if the workers gain skills in teambuilding interventions. The situation can be approached in the following ways:

Effective communication on the teambuilding intervention- the best approach is to communicate such a form of change explicitly by explaining to everyone whatever is happening. Formal and informal conversations permit one to make sure that all workers in an organization get the news concerning the change, which is about to take place in the company. These can be achieved through the use of communication channels such as town halls, emails, company intranets as well as meetings have done face-to-face, without a doubt teambuilding intervention message would spread across the entire organization (You, Jieun, Junghwan and Doo 326). Thus, it is essential to employ various ways of communication in the event of a change. This will assist in explaining the visions, goals as well as anticipations of whatever is required to take place and why such developments are needed in the company.

Overcome oppositions- irrespective of how an organization manages its change process, and there is often resistance which shall be experienced. Thus, as the head of teambuilding intervention, it is imperative to engage everyone who is opposed to the process. Through doing that, such individuals may dynamically air their concerns, thus alleviating possible problems timely. Through giving workers time of providing their inputs assures them that they are component of the team which cares for the rights of employees in an organization.

Works Cited

Bansal, Gaurav, Fatemeh Mariam Zahedi, and David Gefen. “Do context and personality matter? Trust and privacy concerns in disclosing private information online.” Information & Management 53.1 (2016): 1-21.

Donaldson, Hal. Disruptive Compassion: Becoming the Revolutionary You Were Born to Be. Zondervan, 2019.

Drinka, D., & Yen, M. Y. M. (2019). Controlling curriculum redesign with a process improvement model. Journal of Information Systems Education, 19(3), 10.

You, Jieun, Junghwan Kim, and Doo Hun Lim. “Organizational Learning and Change: Strategic Interventions to Deal with Resistance.” Handbook of Research on Human Resources