Is regional government answer to urban sprawl? Briefly explain why or why not.

Is regional government answer to urban sprawl? Briefly explain why or why not.

The regional government is a total remedy to suburban due to delegation of powers. The regional government allows for the development in other urban centres rather than concentrating in one city for the central government. It permits expansivity and growth in a controllable manner. Regional governments reduce the high cost of living in significant towns, air pollution, reduce jams and traffic and restrict agricultural capacity

Briefly explain why the regional government has not been widely adopted?

In many countries, regional governments have not been embraced since there lacks a transparent sharing of responsibilities between the national government and the regional government. The fund allocation to the regional government is also another stumbling block towards the adoption of the regional government.

Identify three reasons that local governments oppose state mandates?

Government mandates towards the local governments may be opposed for the following reasons. They deter the local authority, and its legislature requires a lot of procedures and reporting, it is very expensive.

What are the differences between sprawl and smart growth?

Sprawl designates urban centres that lack planning spread out and delayed development while smart growth is a term that describes a sustainable community which include having every resource required.

Sprawl urban is characterized by low-density, where the ratio of people or jobs to development is limited. On the other hand, smart growth entails high density.

Sprawl urban has poor infrastructure compared to smart growth which has very vibrant transport systems that call for good transit that ensure adequate riders. The proximity to public transit is greatly reduced.

Sprawl has single zoning, unlike smart growth which has a complete community.

Which form of city government, strong/mayor or council/manager seems best for public accountability?

Strong/mayor is best for public accountability. Furthermore, the mayor is the head, and at least it depicts a visible and intact leadership. Therefore the voters can directly point at the mayor if something goes wrong. The mayor is responsible for the preparation and implementation of budget, administration and other operations.

What is the difference between significant and district elections? What system works best? Explain your answer.

At significant election is a system whereby, the voters of the whole city, elect entire group of the city council. By district, voting is a system where, members of a particular district, which is geographically divided, elects their own member of the city council within their jurisdiction.

By district election seems to the best due to the following reasons; the council members elected in by district election are more familiar with the community-specific problems such as levels of crime, garbage collection, potholes, development level and even recreation level. There is increased voters participation since council members representing the district are more responsive to their districts. There is a better representation of members of a particular district mostly the members with geographical base and those with a certain color.

What is the difference between the types of general-purpose governments: counties, cities and towns.

Counties are representatives of local governments which offer overall government services.

Their population concentration differentiates cities and town, but they all are a form of sub-county local government that deliver general governments services.

What is the difference between a strong mayor and a weak mayor? Why do you think modern reformers and specialists prefer the strong mayor system?

A strong mayor is elected straight to the office by the citizens while a weak mayor is elected from the existing city council. Reformers prefer strong mayor system since they can manipulate the citizen if they need any change in the city council. Moreover, they can as well use the mayor to reform since he has the veto power. Specialists still prefer the strong mayor system since one person can solve their problem without involving the entire county council members.