Is This What Democracy Looks Like?
The chapter is about how democracy was born in Greek from the Aristocratic rule that dwelt before. It shows how they won the change without engaging in the fight through building districts to greater unifying the citizens of Greek. It also the shadows behind democratic rules in the United States, mostly through the electoral process. The chapter digs the widening gaps between the whites and the blacks and the rich and the poor. To remain in power, the Republicans have tried as much as possible to make the blacks, and those coming from marginalized grounds have no touch in power in order not make to the demands of those elected. They have employed unbalanced voting power as manifested in the gerrymandering system, splitting of A&T Campus to reduce the influence of unity to voice as one.
Descriptive Language
The real and true democracy in the United States can be portrayed through voting rights. That is one person one vote, but that is not true, provoking Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg to compare the Court’s resolution to a person casting off his umbrella since he’s not getting wet. Democracy will prevail when the needs of all Americans have been taken care of, as in the case of Hinton, where she needs proper policing, tackling food and security. Don't use plagiarised sources.Get your custom essay just from $11/page
Normative Language
Voter suppression is wrong as it denies one to be presented in power by those having majority votes lifting tension that come during the voting event, as evidenced in A&T campus. Fair counting of the votes which would remedy cure the U.S. system’s differences are dismissed and termed as outside the realm of possibility.
Performative Language
The chapter argues that if the U.S. could copy the leadership styles from the United Kingdom, then American politics could have been transformative. Creation of new forms of stifling black voices and weak voices so that their votes are not diluted.
Fallacies identification
The United States’ governance talks of free and fair elections as the trademark of American democracy, a system of moderated disputes.
Main Claim Identification in the Chapter
The main claim in the chapter is about unfairness in the U.S. voting process in relation to the vote’s power. The process has resulted in injustice in terms of power in governance and employment.
Reconstruction of Argument in Support of the Claim
Voting fairness is the way forward if the U.S. needs to protect and preserve democracy in its system. All grumbles and protest would be reduced, and boldness among the races in it upheld
Interpretation of the Argument
When the blacks and marginalized groups have elected and either their candidate win or fails fairly, democracy is demonstrated, and they become contented with the results. Their needs will be catered for in case their candidate get in position thus feel proud of being represented.
Strengths and Weakness of the Argument
The positive thing with the argument is that resources are well allocated, feelings of fairness, and a sense of ownership and pride by the lesser groups in the U.S. enforced. The weak part of the argument is that the elite families will take a grudge on those groups.
Chapter 1: Free to be Winners and Losers
The chapter is about equality and freedom, the relationship between the two, and how different people interpret or conceive what they are all about. The groups involved hailed from different dimensions of life as a peaceful nation such as the U.S. and war-torn zones such as Athens, actors, and anchors.
Descriptive Language
Athens’ assembly showed democracy through engaging in an open-in-practice. Equality before the law was portrayed by a ten-foot-tall statue bearing a strong, fearsome lion and small, docile lamb at the University of Toronto law school.
Normative Language
Freedom is not about hurting, killing, and shooting others because you have the position to do but is about showing human virtue to those in need of it. Freedom is not about enslaving black men at the expense of benefiting themselves. It is not in accordance when an individual is elected in power with self-interests as in the case of choosing President Bush, who has an appetite in big lands some that hand doubts of possession in a legal manner.
Performative Language
The Pakistanis shot dead the Afghanis who sought refuge in Pakistan. In 2018 election was rigged to favor the candidature of interest. If true economic nature could have been addressed in support of true consensus, and granting the minorities chances to add their input, the constitution could have been genuine and fair.
Fallacies identification
The U.S. governance boost of how they have put in place a system that safeguards equality of its citizen but in reality, the opposite holds.
Main Claim Identification in the Chapter
The main claim in the chapter is about inequality in the sharing of power and the lack of freedom to express thought by the marginalized group. This has resulted in a conflict of interest without being concerned with the welfare of black people.
Reconstruction of Argument in Support of the Claim
When equality and freedom prevail in the system, peace, and respect of everyone’s rights are respected by the law and the fellow citizens. A good representation of people in the government creates fairness and confidence sustained.
Interpretation of the Argument
Freedom of mind is paramount to the wellbeing of human beings both in living peacefully and in one’s undertakings. Fair governance and representation create cohesion in any society.
Strengths and Weakness of the Argument
The advantage of the above argument is that confidence, trust, and equality are manifested in the country that protects equality and freedom though at a recommendable limit. Allocation of resources benefits them all without grumbling. Protests and demonstrations reduced making a conducive environment in the nation-building. The negative side of freedom is that ultimate freedom tends to be dangerous as one would do whatever pleases him or her, even if infringing pain and suffering to a fellow citizen.