Legalization of marijuana in Colorado and other states

Legalization of marijuana in Colorado and other states

Introduction

The main purpose of this analysis is to document the marijuana legalization in Colorado and what ultimately led to do so. Currently, Colorado is serving as the nation’s experiment essentially by allowing other states and nations to observe the effects of this legislation. Being one of the largest states in terms of land mass, Colorado has always been a state Colorado is one of the largest American states mostly in terms of land mass analysis. The state is located in in the Rocky Mountain region on the western of United States. Therefore, diverse natural recourses in the state have led to the attraction of the plain Indians and the Pueblo people. Admittedly, the discovery of Gold in Colorado has, therefore, attracted many investors and new settlers which have played a major role in sustaining their economy for quite some time. However, Colorado continued relying on its natural recourses as well as tourism and agriculture schemes to sustain its economy but needed to find other methods to increase it.

Recently, different states endorsed varying degrees on the discussion of legalized marijuana by authorizing the medical marijuana use and also permitting it on recreational purposes. Because of the continuous study of its effects and medical benefits, in the year 2010, Colorado’s legislature approved the legislation that had comprised on licensing the medical centers on marijuana use, manufacturing of marijuana, and the cultivation processes all for medical purposes. As its medical usage increased and more politicians realized that its effects aren’t hindering society in November 2012, Colorado electors legalized the recreational marijuana use thus permitting individuals to use marijuana and the liberty of marijuana plantation owners to produce up to six plants. The amendment of the drug also legalized the licensing of the cultivation processes, the marijuana comestible industries, and the marijuana retail stores, displaying an exponential growth rate in its usage.

Why Colorado legalized marijuana.

The constitution in Colorado State was amended to permit the consumption of marijuana for medical purposes for patients who suffered from chronic debilitating medical disorders. However, limited patients accessed the marijuana medical procedure until when the United States Attorney General provided procedures for the state’s trial on the possession of marijuana thus abandoning the dominion of marijuana act of law enforcement to the State government (Blake and Finlaw 2014. p 359). Therefore, it altered the permissive federal policy and the local law on the consumption of marijuana in the State of Colorado. Evidently, anyone who was recognized with the conditions drawn by the Colorado law was issued with a medical marijuana license which had no expiration date. Therefore, the amount of the licenses issued increased widely across the state. Admittedly, the amendment which legalized the possession and the purchase of marijuana in the state was approved by 55% of voters in Colorado. During the next year after the amendment was approved by voters, the state legislature employed policy advisors who were to determine public health implications and outline the dispensary regulations on the legalization of marijuana (Hopfer 2014.p 333). Medical marijuana dispensaries and more the 292 retail dispensaries were therefore licensed with the use of marijuana on patients.

Patients who suffered from seizure disorder benefited from the component present in marijuana known as cannabidiol, however, numerous clinical trials helped on enrolling the patients from the disorder. Marijuana is likely to contain some anti-inflammatory effects and may, however, assist patients suffering from the inflammatory bowel disease (Hopfer 2014.p 333). Notably, marijuana may contain and hold the harmless therapeutic window more than the opioids for agony release and different studied readings acknowledged that scarce opioids which were associated with deaths in the states. Therefore, it is un-doubtful about marijuana being contemporary effective in an extensive range of health complications that were approved in Colorado law. Admittedly, the legalization of the marijuana law has relatively amplified many opportunities for the clinical scientists in studying the positive health effects of marijuana with its improved consumptions in Colorado. However, according to the federal institution of marijuana, it has provided a wide range of the disorders inconsistency on the effectiveness of marijuana thus emphasizing the importance of discovering a high-quality research on medical disorders rather than the consumption of marijuana.

According to (Rubens 2014. p 125). Increased availability and consumption of marijuana has relatively altered health care utilization linked to marijuana exposure. They examined that, Tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) is however related with psychosis, the act of depression symptoms and anxiety thus creating an analysis of the fundamental psychiatric illnesses inevitable. Conversely, it is hard to completely enumerate the probability of increased healthcare utilization simply because marijuana consumption is, however, corresponding with other etiquettes that lead to healthcare visits. With the considerable increase in marijuana use, patients end up being on the emergency departments (EDs) due to vomiting, anxiety, public intoxication, and other nonspecific symptoms (Kamin, 2012.p 147). Admittedly, the Colorado University outreached approximately 2000 patients per week with marijuana intoxication and other marijuana connected illnesses.

Political implementation of marijuana legalization in Colorado

Undeniably, opponents and the supporters on the legalization of marijuana are organizing a vital contest over the poll measures across the half of the states to date. Changing the political battlefield far away from the traditional liberal sates to some of the conservative areas in the state. Therefore, two measures have been organized to appear on the next ballot era. Colorado voters will either decide on retaining state in the legalization of marijuana consumption for recreational purposes or other voters in Utah on the same state will consider legalizing pot for medical use. The political implications of marijuana consumption have relatively helped the state to change its legal position (Hudak, J., 2014. p 649). Legalizing marijuana have brought a big push to the state’s economy as well as the federal government. Admittedly, the implementation of legalizing marijuana in Colorado has remained to be critical at a glance level. Notably, government failures lower the moral of any personnel are expensive, cause expensive public political embarrassment and creates market uncertainty (Galston and Dionne 2013. p 10). The implementation of any act by the government matters a lot more than any political costs. However, high outline implementation leads to several failures such that of the rollout of the Affordable Care Acts federal. In each of the case, public and political officials faced tremendous setbacks. Forevermore, early implementation verdicts are relatively most important for it would help in designing the program to enhance its subsequent development in future.

Understandably, in the legalization of marijuana, implementation matters mostly in more other unique reasons. Firstly, Colorado’s implementation advances to other unusual federalism issues. This is demonstrated well when marijuana distribution, cultivation, possession, and consumption are legalized in Colorado hence those activities remains to be violations of the federal regulations and laws. However, the justice department in Colorado sealed out a memo which clarified all the priorities of the federal government. The memo states that, the capability to permit marijuana possession, invention, and distribution to implement the effective implementation schemes which will address the threats that the laws could pose to public health, safety, and further law implementation interests (McMahon 2017.). Admittedly, the federal government would disconnect the speech approach on the enforcement of the organized substances if only the Colorado’s implementation regulates comprehensively and effectively. The states federal government also poses a risk on stepping in, hence shutting down the indorsed marijuana law in Colorado.

Admittedly, any drastic administrative changes would not be successful without the leadership on existing being committed and creating it to work. However, in Colorado leadership being at the top was somehow absolutely critical. The enforcement of the legalized medical marijuana clopped down within the jurisdiction of the federal government in bringing the regulatory order from what was what was recognized as chaotic and out of control on the marijuana system consumption. Therefore, the disunion was undermined with problems that came from leaders due to their inefficiency on the implementation of marijuana use. The effectiveness of any policy implementation leads to its success without any impartiality. In this regard, marijuana legalization withstands to be an issue of its own uniqueness and more complex (Boylan 2015). Therefore, the States leaders in Colorado from the governor to all agency heads on lawmakers together with a diversity of performers who acted approximately in an era of political operations. They set apart their own personal opinions despite the idea that Colorado wanted the legalization of marijuana and it was their obligation to make that a reality.

The leadership only amounted on the commitment of a good environment across Colorado, whereby many state leaders pressured on ensuring that state employees, agencies, and officials thus conveying what is most essential on implementing the law. However, any support that came from the political leadership seemed to be tangential on the implementation of marijuana. Law enforcement changes have been organized at the federal’s government level, where the officials are employed on working with the local law enforcement thus helping Colorado’s citizens acknowledge what changes are important with the community (Caulkins and Kilmer 2016. p 2083). Forevermore, as the legalization of marijuana program grows across the country, more and various prominent statistics are however uttering their main support on the Implementation of marijuana. Admittedly, Morgan Freeman spoke out in an indulgence of decriminalizing marijuana urging that Colorado should just legalize and marijuana and however tax it on as we do to other states. Majority of the several politicians figured out their different opinions compiling a list of what they alter. According to Richard Posner, it would be intellectual on criminalizing the distribution of marijuana hence there is no alteration with cigarettes. Therefore, the problem of using the criminal law as a primary means of dealing with problems of misuse addiction and ingesting dangerous drugs, it would not be of any help.  Evidently, marijuana decriminalization endures being one the political aspect that it is becoming prevalent over time. Forevermore, the majority of non-violent Colorado’s citizens would be liked up. However, instead of attaching the consumers in an appropriate way, we should then cater to them giving them alternatives to steer them away from drug abuse consumption. Notably, it basically does not amplify a sense of humanity by wasting more millions of dollars hitting large numbers of America in prison for none violence petitioners.

Other countries with legalized marijuana and the reasons why

Historical shifts are trending everywhere on the act of marijuana policy. After Colorado and Washington’s states became the first states on legalizing the consumption of marijuana for medical and recreational purposes, other states have therefore monitored the way and of legalizing marijuana. However, the legalization of marijuana growing and possession on other states have improved sales on recreational purposes. Admittedly, the spread of marijuana legalization has aided to a reimagining of United States drug policy and in which ways it has exactly how it should adjust hence people tend to seek for many alternatives to diminish the criminal justice policies that have adequately led to more violence and the black market that brings up violent criminal enterprises. However, marijuana remains to be illegal under the federal law through the Obama supervision said that it would allow states-levels rules to work without more interference of the federal government. Conversely, the Trump administration has taken a tougher line of giving power to federal prosecutors to bring down the marijuana consumption even where it is legal which could, in turn, allow the federal law diminish the state’s legal pot business.

Evidently, states which legalized marijuana for recreational purposes have therefore landed on a commercialization level, where for private and for-profits organizations sell the drugs on a wider range (). However, the officials of the state have therefore enforced some rules on sales such as the drug should be sold to adults over 21 years old. The states which have in turn legalized marijuana consumption found that it has helped them eradicate the black market thus producing the paramount public health results. Forevermore, not only legalization and prohibition of marijuana matters most but also determining the form of legalization that would bring benefits on minimizing the fierce black market for pot thus reducing the negative results of the increased drug consumption. Admittedly, there have been a lot of political aspects that have brought rise on the legalization of marijuana in this states, though the rise of recreational purposes and medical usage have also affected the change.

California, Maine, Oregon, Colorado, Vermont, and the Washington States are the states that have legalized marijuana through the aid of the federal law government. Undeniably, the federal government of the states has assisted on marijuana legalization for recreational purposes in order to generate taxes. People who thought that voting on legalizing marijuana for recreational purposes would benefit the local area were mistaken. On a political stance, it will particularly benefit the town in large hence generating benefits to the political leaders who facilitated on the legalization. Evidently, there have been laws that aided on the legal consumption of marijuana for either recreational purposes or medical usage. Washington’s initiative act 502; in the year 2012, the state’s residents voted on legalizing marijuana for recreational purposes as the same as Colorado did (Anderson and Rees 2014. p 222). This facilitated the rise on Washington’s market to expand on recreational purpose. Forevermore, the legalization advocates ascertain that States should legalize marijuana in order to eliminate the black market hence generate more taxes to the federal government.

Other states that illegalized marijuana with their reasons and the political implementations.

Admittedly, legalizing marijuana have been of benefits to many states, other states end up decriminalizing marijuana. Therefore, possessing any small amount of marijuana carries longer criminal consequences such as imprisonment, however, any possession of higher quantities, selling and trafficking residues to be criminally illegal within the state. Understandably, decriminalization laws very differently from state to state. Some states impeach tough fines in possession of marijuana while other prosecute on jail time. According to a report from Cato Institute in 2009, many people with drug disorders tend to seek treatment services in this states because all drugs were decriminalized hence eradicating the fear of accusation which may lead to arrest (Thies and Register1993. p 386). Ultimately, decriminalization of marijuana hinders users from having a legal source of the drug thus helping the criminal organizations have a source of enough revenue that would help them fight the violent actions across the world.

Notably, states that have decriminalized marijuana consumptions have been facilitated by political factors which aim at relying on a specific aspect in the country. Advocates, therefore, came into a conclusion that, many politicians fight for the legalization of marijuana for recreational purpose in the development of their own determinations. Admittedly this would lead to the advancement of an illegal black market in the country thus decreasing the state’s economy compared to others.

Analysis.

Undoubtedly, the argument concerning marijuana legalization withstands to be the main reason the political background is changing in the United States in relation to the criminal policies on drugs that Americans seems to have failed to the state’s finances and liberty. Evidently, the marijuana legalization crisis has extremely caused the US billions of dollars over many years. This led to the development of the black market of pot where the criminal organizations funded corrupt organizations which later contributed to the unstable development of Americans population. Opponents and supporters of marijuana legalization acknowledged some failures though they both disagreed if legalization of the drug would be of benefit to the local.

Admittedly, supporters of the legalization argued that legalizing marijuana would be the only way of winding up all violent organizations and eventually seizure all nonviolent sellers of marijuana. However, there is a disagreement among different supporters on how to legalize marijuana either for recreational purposes or medical usage. The other opposing side of marijuana legalization suggests that there are consequences of legalizing marijuana in the country and would it be easier on advertising the product as alcohol and corporations do in promoting their products (Dias 2017). The marijuana legalization debate would continue for decades but it is not the assumption that the reform should occur or any change goes beyond limits. In this regard, it is not which option is the best on the drug policy but which choice is least wicked. Eventually, after decades America amounting to fight to the greatest assaults about drug policy rule, Americans may develop and be ready to try something different that would effectively.

Recommendations

Admittedly, similar to taxation, regulations are always set to for determining who would consume and how they would consume. Therefore, during marijuana regulation, this has to be present in order to ensure that the range consumptions in the state related to the consequences are distinguished.  Notably, regulations are somehow costly to impose and at sometimes holds great incentives on breaking the rules set. Other regulations seem to bound and limit the appropriate speed with which the regulation had been set on hence displaces the illegal markets. In this case, the policy makers undergo difficult challenges while seeking the appropriate balance within all the competing considerations. However, even the elegant regulations can be complex on implementing.

The product regulations are important factors on product security and improving the evidence made available by the consumers concerning the product they are consuming. Adequately, some regulations contain additional long-term penalties of setting the invention cost a little bit higher than expected (Dias 2017). Another regulation if set on limiting children on certain concepts, it helps on limiting their exposure among adolescents. However, to the extent how the regulations restrict products that the consumer’s desires, then generates a new prospect for other inducements. With these sales regulations, which raises the range of the cost marijuana products displays, they, therefore, minimize the higher opportunism of tax evasion in the country. Additionally, they may also bring advantageous effects of accumulating the product safety sold in limited ways. Understandably, all regulations are set with different perspectives hence helping in minimizing the high possibility of direct sales as it normally occurs in the case of tobacco and alcohol. Even though the federal and the public-health organizations understand all these concepts, relating the policies remains to be very uncertain. Ultimately, it is however advisable and very important in applying the regulatory structure to any adaptable situation hence helping in growing the awareness of what may incur in the next decade concerning the threats and profits that are related with the main precise products of marijuana.

The legalization of marijuana has several impacts in Colorado and other parts of the United States. The number of people arrested due to possession of the drug has declined, most people have adapted to using the drug within the specifications and requirements of the government despite the step to legalize the drug having positive impacts, and it also has negative consequences. This literature review provides a summary of findings and other related information of events since the legalization of the drug. Previously marijuana was considered to be an illegal drug which its use was prohibited fully.

The literature review and other information represented below are gathered in several ways. The first source of literature for review comes from web reports, spreadsheets data and briefing information. The second source of information is generated from an analysis of personal information available concerning the subject.

According to the CSA the drug marijuana is clustered under schedule one and is presumed to be dangerous through the state legislature has legalized its medical application and usage. District of Columbia and other twenty-three other states had accepted medicinal use of marijuana by December 2015. The acceptance and legalization of medicinal marijuana have increased over the past twenty years with states such as Colorado accepting its use (Monte, Zane, and Heard 2015.p241-242). In Colorado the marijuana law has undergone through five periods which includes pre-2000, between 2000 to 2009, commercialization of medical marijuana between 2010 to 2012, drug use for recreational purposes without medical values in 2013, recreational use and commercialization between 2014 to present. In the period prior to 2000, it was considered to be illegal to plant or possess marijuana. In the period between 2000 to 2009, it was legalized and identification cards were issued to those who are allowed to use the drug through doctor’s recommendation and prescription (Sokoya, et al 2018. p780-783). In the period between 2010 to 2012, there was the commercialization of medical marijuana which was regulated through licensed distributors, producers, and other stakeholders. In 2013 the sixty-fourth amendment came into action which supported growing for personal consumption and limits of recreational purposes but with no commercialization. From 2014 to present the recreational usage plus medical consumption of marijuana is both regulated by the law and commercialized.

Public safety

The overall number of individuals who were being arrested due to marijuana possession decreased by forty-six percent which approximate value of 12,894 going down to 7,004. In the state of Colorado arrest from the possession of cannabis or marijuana tops the list and after implementation of the new legislation, the number was able to go down by negative 47 percent  (Wang, Heard, and Roosevelt, 2017.p50). Also, the arrests which are associated with the selling of marijuana also declined by twenty-four percent while arrests associated with the producing of marijuana did not indicate substantial evidence with a difference of negative two percent.

Considering the general review of police arrests in Colorado, marijuana contributed to 6 percent of overall arrests made in 2012 and by the year 2013, the figure had decreased to 3 percent. Considering various races that live in Colorado the number of arrests among the white people was 51 percent, Hispanics 33 percent and black-Americans 25 percent. El Paso County had a 30 percent decrease in arrests and Adams County indicated 63 percent decrease  (Wang, et al 2018.p120).Considering the judicial system the court’s fillings of marijuana associated cases was able to decline by eighty-one percent from 2012 to 2015 with respective numbers of 10,340 down to 1954. Cases of felonies also decreased by 45 percent from 1023 down to 566 and other petty offenses decreased by 89 percent from 8728 down to 979 with marijuana possession case fillings declining by 88 percent. 69 percent of the cases were against juveniles between the ages of 10 years to 17 years; 78 percent were young adults between the age of eighteen and twenty years old and eighty-six percent were adults above twenty-one years old.

In reference to organized crime, that occurred within Colorado from 2012 to 2015 there was eighty-eight cases that were connected to marijuana where fifty-six cases were associated with distribution, sixteen were conspiracy cases, ten were production cases and six were a possession for reselling. According to the traffic safety department, the analysis of their reports indicated that there was a decline of 1 percent for cases where individuals break the rule and found under the influence.

Public health

The national survey current research survey indicates that the rate of prevalence for exposure to marijuana in the last month shows significant increment in youths from 21 percent before legalization to 31 percent after legalization. Current research reports indicate that usage among adults has increased from five percent in the year 2006 to 12 percent by 2014. The Colorado BRFSS and CDPHE research surveys indicate that fourteen percent of adults have admitted using marijuana in the past thirty days and thirty-three percent of individuals who were presently using on a daily basis. The department of public health in Colorado conducted analysis on hospital data such as diagnosis reports, billing codes and risk of exposure where results indicated that there was an increase from 803 to 2413 after the legalization of marijuana  (Davis, et al 2016. p373-379). The rate of individuals who were using marijuana visits the retailer’s increases from 739 up to 956 per hundred thousand visits. However, the number of visits to emergency distribution centers has been constantly increasing over the past years. The number of emergency calls has increased from 44 to 227 by the year 2015.

Youth impacts

Information about marijuana use among youths is obtained in two sources which are healthy children Colorado survey and a national survey on drug use plus health. The analysis of data from the KKCS shows that there is a slight decrease in the use of marijuana for the past 30 days in youths while on the other hand analysis from the NSDUH indicates a gradual increment in consumption over a period of time (Wang, Heard, and Roosevelt, 2017.p50). In the year 2013, according to HKCS findings, 80 percent of students in high school had not used marijuana in the previous thirty days. The HKCS report indicated that consumption of marijuana among youths gradually increases according to the grade level and on the other hand the NSDUH report analysis indicated that marijuana use among youths in Colorado is beyond the national calculated average. The review of results from the two reports indicates that health threats of marijuana are decreasing among Colorado youths  (Hopfer 2016.p15). The juvenile arrests associated with marijuana have increased by 5 percent and the rate of juvenile arrests which are associated with the drug also has increased by 2 percent. The white juvenile arrests have declined from 2198 in the year 2012 to 2016 by 2014 which represents an 8 percent decline. The Hispanic juvenile who was arrested due to marijuana has gone up from 778 to 1006 considering the same time frame and the results project 29 percent increase. The African-Americans arrests of juveniles in marijuana-related cases increased from 205 to 324 considering the same time frame which indicates 58 percent increase. According to the analysis of drug tests data there is an increase in the percentage of youths between ages of 10 to 14 that test positive for THC, the figure increased from 19 percent to 23 percent in the year 2014. The increases on youths between the ages of 15 to 17 years decreased by 1 percent (Blake and Finlaw 2014. p359). The information from the education department indicated that the rate of student’s suspension from drug-related causes increased from 391 to 506 per hundred thousand students who are registered. Considering the period 2014 to 2015 discipline cases associated with drugs contributed to 41 percent of all expulsion, 31 percent of referrals by law enforcement and 6 percent of all suspension cases in Colorado education institutions.

The Colorado department for education usually provides discipline data about various schools located within the state. Since marijuana was legalized in the state this department has been recording data related to the subject separately. The data collected are rated in terms of hundred thousand where numbers increases considering the number 818443 in 2009 and 889,006 by the end of 2015 (Blake and Finlaw 2014. p359). The drug suspension and expulsion related cases have been increasing drastically wherein 2009 the rate was 29 percent and the expulsion rate has also increased to 39 percent. The rate of law enforcement referrals associated with drug-related aspects was initially having increment rate of 13 percent but there has been gradual by up to 51 percent.

Legalization of marijuana has various consequences and endangering of children is one of them. According to the CHS conducted in 2014, indicated that parents which children between ages of 1 to 14, four percent of them had used marijuana in the last thirty days and considering method of consumption 76 percent were smokers, 39 percent consumed the drug through vaping while 14 percent ate it as food  (Wang, Heard, and Roosevelt, 2017.p50). Considering parent with children in the age bracket indicated above 7 percent had marijuana product available in their house. 92 percent of them insisted they kept the drug out of their children’s reach, 89 percent of the parents stored their product in the childproof container while 71 percent kept their drug in a locked container.

The marijuana enforcement division is responsible for the provision of license and regulation of its application in the medical practice. This division is mandated to generate regulations, implement legislation, and execute background analysis and issuance of business permits in order to implement a regulatory structure that is robust. From a financial perspective, the revenue which has been generated from tax, fees, levies, and licenses have increased by 77 percent from 76,152,468 dollars up to 135,100,465 dollars  (Wang, Hoyte, Roosevelt, and Heard 2019. p0009922818805206). The increase in revenue was majorly influenced by sales and other business activities related to marijuana. The large portion of the revenues generated came from the selling of marijuana. The money collected from the marijuana tax was used to build schools which sums to approximately 40 million dollars. The trend of medical marijuana cardholders has been increasing since 2009 after the drug was commercialized. By 2015, the number of register individuals who were holding cards was 109,922 in Colorado with average overall age of 42.5 and male cardholders were 65 percent while the remaining were female card holders (Reed 2016 p.130-200).  51 percent of the cardholders were above forty years old. The individuals in the old age use medical marijuana for various purposes where 93 percent of users have severe pain, 20 percent have muscle spasms and 12 percent of medical users have strong nausea.

Challenges

The most prevailing challenge is that data collection is subject to unmeasured alterations in human behavior associated with marijuana. The decrease in social stigma related to marijuana will result in more individuals willing to provide current information and participate in various surveys (Wang, et al 2018. p367). Legalization of marijuana has resulted in increased usage and this is confirmed with analysis of reports from emergency departments and hospitals. More individuals are willing to discuss their marijuana consumption information since it was legalized. Legalization of the drug has resulted in changes in various strategies being used by law enforcers to handle marijuana associated cases. The other challenges include restrictions in accessing data associated with the subject, lag time between when information was gathered and when it was available for access.

The marijuana legalization in Colorado has undergone a transformation in five stages with each of them having its set of rules and regulations. There have been negative and positive consequences since its legislation which has affected the state either way or the other. The trends of crime rates, marijuana consumption, and other aspects have also changed over a period of time. The content above provides findings from a literature review of research studies associated with the subject.

Conclusion

Initially, the legalization of marijuana in the US was an essential change in drug policy. Notably, the states; Colorado and Washington and others that legalized marijuana consumption for both medical and recreational purposes, they have the opportunity on creating a political superiority by distribution, possession, and cultivation of marijuana. However, if establishing the necessary structures and policies in absence of comparable models was not adequate, the presence of intergovernmental problems brings forth a coat of complexity within the controversial environment. Admittedly, if the local government cannot discover and prevent people from consumption of illegal drugs, it can, however, choose whether they can allow the process of RME within the jurisdiction of the country. In addition, the local option of the government has in sighted the policy of implementation and adoption. This theory tends to understand deeper about the adoption of RME at the local level and the related obstacles to its implementation. In order this to work, a survey has to be conducted on the entire state, administrators, and managers. Therefore, the survey would work as a status check where citizens at the local would gain information about the implementation. Evidently, some survey had been conducted and stated out that, the local federal government which contains smaller populations, are further probably have forbidden the process of RME. Moreover, this displays how the local governments are functioning effectively on changing the present marijuana policies, as the localities which have already allowed the operation of MME has allowed the functioning of RME at considerably higher degrees.in this regard, on the implementation process, it seems that a lot of diverse organizations have been involved in the enforcement and planning processes hence lacking the anxiety concerning the fiscal issues existing. However, there has been a justly small degree of concern about the potential federal government enforcement act amongst all the local governments in the state.

Works cited

Blake, D. and Finlaw, J., 2014. Marijuana legalization in Colorado: Learned lessons. Harv. L. & Pol’y Rev., 8, p.359.

Hopfer, C., 2014. Implications of marijuana legalization for adolescent substance use. Substance Abuse, 35(4), pp.331-335.

Anderson, D.M. and Rees, D.I., 2014. The legalization of recreational marijuana: how likely is the worst‐case scenario?. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 33(1), pp.221-232.

Galston, W.A. and Dionne Jr, E.J., 2013. The new politics of marijuana legalization: why opinion is changing. Governance Studies at Brookings, pp.1-17.

Kamin, S., 2012. Medical marijuana in Colorado and the future of marijuana regulation in the United States. McGeorge L. Rev., 43, p.147.

Rubens, M., 2014. Political and medical views on medical marijuana and its future. Social work in public health, 29(2), pp.121-131.

Hudak, J., 2014. Colorado’s rollout of legal marijuana is succeeding: a report on the state’s implementation of legalization. Case W. Res. L. Rev., 65, p.649.

Thies, C.F. and Register, C.A., 1993. Decriminalization of marijuana and the demand for alcohol, marijuana and cocaine. The Social Science Journal, 30(4), pp.385-399.

Caulkins, J.P. and Kilmer, B., 2016. Considering marijuana legalization carefully: insights for other jurisdictions from analysis for Vermont. Addiction, 111(12), pp.2082-2089.

McMahon, J., 2017. Marijuana History and Legal Aspects in the United States.

Dias, N., 2017. An Empirical Analysis of the Marijuana Market.

Boylan, S., 2015. Colorado’s drug movement and the repeal of cannabis prohibition: Changing policy and public opinion (Doctoral dissertation, Northern Arizona University).

Monte, A.A., Zane, R.D. and Heard, K.J., 2015. The implications of marijuana legalization in Colorado. Jama, 313(3), pp.241-242.

Wang, G.S., Davies, S.D., Halmo, L.S., Sass, A., and Mistry, R.D., 2018. Impact of marijuana legalization in Colorado on adolescent emergency and urgent care visits. Journal of Adolescent Health.

Davis, J.M., Mendelson, B., Berkes, J.J., Suleta, K., Corsi, K.F. and Booth, R.E., 2016. Public health effects of medical marijuana legalization in Colorado. American journal of preventive medicine, 50(3), pp.373-379.

Hopfer, C., 2016, December. Marijuana Legalization in Colorado: Impact on Adolescents. In NEUROPSYCHOPHARMACOLOGY (Vol. 41, pp. S15-S15). MACMILLAN BUILDING, 4 CRINAN ST, LONDON N1 9XW, ENGLAND: NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP.

Wang, G.S., Heard, K. and Roosevelt, G., 2017. The Unintended Consequences of Marijuana Legalization.

Wang, G.S., Hoyte, C., Roosevelt, G. and Heard, K., 2019. The Continued Impact of Marijuana Legalization on Unintentional Pediatric Exposures in Colorado. Clinical pediatrics, p.0009922818805206.

Reed, J.K., 2016. Marijuana Legalization in Colorado, Early Findings: A Report Pursuant to Senate Bill 13-283. Colorado Department of Public Safety, Division of Criminal Justice, Office of Research and Statistics.

Wang, G.S., Davies, S.D., Halmo, L.S., Sass, A., and Mistry, R.D., 2018. Marijuana legalization and adolescent health. Journal of Adolescent Health, 63(3), p.367.

Sokoya, M., Eagles, J., Oakland, T., Coughlin, D., Dauber, H., Greenlee, C. and Winkler, A.A., 2018. Patterns of facial trauma before and after the legalization of marijuana in Denver, Colorado: A joint study between two Denver hospitals. The American journal of emergency medicine, 36(5), pp.780-783.