Letter from a Birmingham jail
The reading concerns a man who has spent some time “martin Luther king” in prison and demonstration of the essential wrongness that penetrate through humanity. Trying to find out if there are laws that are there to protect people, anyway, who are the people that are being protected by the law? Luther got an understanding that the rules of the society may not necessarily be real laws or either what he regarded as God’s laws, and he had the knowledge that they required to be fought and be changed for the wellbeing of humankind (Martin Luther King). The speaker is seen explaining himself why he is in Birmingham from the ties between his organization and the host on a program “non-violent direct action,” but in addition to that was on matters of justice. Where the speaker explained as the apostle carried the gospel to all corners of the world the same case to them, they had landed in Birmingham to compel on the doctrine of justice (Martin Luther King) the speaker explains to the listeners that he was regarded as a radical for justice. and he asked them questions as to why Jesus was not considered an extremist when he advocated for love to one’s enemies, but why he is being labeled a radical when enlightening citizens about their rights and justice? (Martin Luther King)
The speaker is focused on creating insights on why the selection of the direct action where there other negotiation paths for the derivation of justice where the immediate non-violent effect is the way that creates crisis and enforcing for negotiation of the disputes in place. The speaker is highly concerned with the use of peaceful negotiation tools for the demand of justice of which is in line with his idea of the quench for justice? (Martin Luther King). The discussion is expected to thrive the audience to sharpen and remain vibrant in demand for justice. The rhetorical aspect in the excerpt arises when the speaker raises a question to himself about the action to be taken and why? Then going on by providing solutions to the posed question