offenders who conducted attacks independently without the help of any group or organization
The report examined offenders who conducted attacks independently without the help of any group or organization. This article expected to inform us how law enforcement and the public responds to potential threats. The primary concept in this report is that there is no one demographic profile. Special Agent who conducted the research believed that a general analysis of an individual committing the crime should be done. The study would help to show up the factors that drive such individuals to use violence to solve their issues. Therefore, no checklist can be used to conclude that a specific person is a threat or not.
There is a need to know how and when to report purported threats and dangers. A lot of information towards potential risks can be gathered not only from law enforcement firms but also from friends and relatives of attackers. Research shows that the family of the aggressors and close friends can notice and identify threatening attitudes and behaviors from the assailants. Only those who are close to the invaders can curb their practices. Therefore, it is more prudent to raise concerns and issues whenever they appear than ignoring them.
Everyone has a role in preventing these acts of crime, ranging from parents, siblings, classmates, mental health counselors to law enforcement agencies. It is very crucial to build teamwork of people who can effectively examine and control suspected threats. Finding from the report do indicate that effective and efficient cooperation and coordination between community and local law firms help to prevent attacks from occurring. There should be effective communication between law agencies, social services, and parole.
The significant findings from the articles show that 83 % of the invaders had previously shown any aggressive behavior. The 96 % of assailants had already written documents which were intended to be seen by others. In most cases, more than one individual knows about the invader’s intentions to attack or the preparation for an attack. Mostly, the targets attacked lacks security. The reports show that 25 % of the invaders have been diagnosed with mental disorders before they strike.
Strategies for avoiding future threats
security of potential risks, the government should have security measures that protect institutions and people who are likely targets of assailants. This will help to reduce the chances of terrorist attacks.
Recognition of radicalization, the invaders, goes through the process of radicalization before using violence. The community stakeholders, like teachers and youth workers, should recognize these signs and report their doubts to criminal authorities or the police. Reporting radicalization timely can prevent it from becoming terrorism.
The government should also come with severe measures to punish terrorists once they are caught. Terrorist offenses are crimes conducted to cause terror. The punishment for such crimes should apply harsher. Punishing offenders severely can make other potential invaders to commit an attack to terminate their mission, thus reducing the rate of terrorism.
Therefore, based on these findings, I would conclude that effective communication between the local laws and community stakeholders. Effective communication helps to improve the relationship with bystanders, who barely report crimes. The benefits of proper coordination are immense. Recognizing and reporting potential crimes timely is more valuable than recovering from an attack.