Outline of Why the United States Should Adapt To European Data Protection Policy
- Security
- UE- the handling and access to databases that concern the welfare of the citizens have always been guarded with a lot of secrecy (Danezis 234).
- USA- political parties and campaigns almost face no regulations in respect to access, collection, and dissemination of citizen’s data
- Personal data used by the major candidates and political parties without consent in the last election.
2) Political exploitation in regard to data access and use.
- USA– political systems and have no any legal implications under US privacy law for invasion of private data.
- EU- advanced method of data collection and analysis
- EU- more comprehensive data protection systems and legislation compared to the US.
- USA: a high number of individuals involved in big data security and access creates a data security problem.
- 50,000 people in Arkansas University affected dues to the high number of people accessing sensitive data in the university.
- eBay data breach, 145 million people affected and birthday, home address and emails address stolen.
- EU- controls the physical space and access to sensitive to information by the use of a single access point
- USA- storage of data in different regions and places increasing vulnerability based on size, distribution and a broad range of access.
Don't use plagiarised sources.Get your custom essay just from $11/page
- Unsecured medical information and banking
- USA- primarily deteriorated security during recording, storage of bank and health information.
- EU- improved banking and health data and information through increased security
- USA- trade of personal medical and banking data to private for prediction of consumer
- USA- increased number of cybersecurity crimes and data pilferage through action fraudsters.
- EU- improved policies in protecting and safeguarding public sensitive data that have an impact on social, economic and political impact on people such as health, insurance and information data (Koops 250).
- US- outdated informatics system in the healthcare resulting in elevated data loss and interference with health records.
- EU- tight informatics system that is well customized to deal with possible data theft attempts.
- USA- use of medical and health records for political gains.
- Health informatics used in campaigns in 2017.
- Political frauds
- The extensive assumption of user agreements because they are long or boring
- EU- European data protection policy user agreements have been outlined shortly and easily to enable people to read and understand for themselves.
- Short
- Understandable
- USA-Policy user agreements long version which has long and tedious user agreements (Stucke, Maurice and Allen 564).
- People committing to some agreements which may cost them their future.
- Exploitation by corporates which have realized this gaps in the policy user agreements due to the tendency of people of avoiding the agreement.
- Lack of understanding of the need to read the policy user agreements.
- Poor policies and guide the writing and scripting of the policy use agreements.
- USA – data protection policy and agreements expressed in high legal terms to the extent that for non-lawmakers it’s hard to comprehend
- High control on the data that can share in EU and Low control of what data can be shared in the US
- EU- goods policies that enable testing of data to evaluate which data can be shared by the citizens.
- EU- improved public knowledge on which data and information and which not to share.
- USA- high number of malware that results in involuntary data sharing by the citizens