philosopher’s views on the planet and will expound on the ultimate human reality
A group of prisoners is held in an underground cave where they are only able to see what is in front of them. Behind them, a fire has been lit and also some men carrying objects that seem to cast shadows on the cave walls. All prisoners have been exposed to these images, and after some time, they come to think that the shadows are part of their reality.Later one of the prisoners escapes from the darkness of the cave, and after he reaches the sunlight, he was blinded by the bright light. After some time, his eyes start to adjust after he realizes that he is experiencing the outside world when all he had seen are illusions of shadows.
Feeling remorse for his friends, he goes back to his friends to try and free them. However, things do not go as it is planned, since the prisoners kill him, thinking the shadow is part of the reality. This is one of the famous analogies of Plato, a prominent greek philosopher who tried to discover the fact of human life. His search was so peculiar, radical, and counterintuitive that he became widely known throughout the Athen. Plato was considered to be a charismatic man, and with this nature, he was able to gain admiration, particularly from the youth of Athens. This story illustrates how various individuals have different worldviews. The man who freed himself and accepts that the shadows are not part of his reality explains how he moves from the world of sense into world forms. And those that kill him agree that the shadows are part of their world. The essay will explain the philosopher’s views on the planet and will expound on the ultimate human reality. Don't use plagiarised sources.Get your custom essay just from $11/page
Ultimate nature of Reality;
It is essential first to grasp Plato’s distinction of things and form to grasp his worldview. According to Plato, things are the aspects of reality in which humans perceive through senses they include, pen, book, or a car. Everything that is experienced in the world sensation constantly changes. For instance, the book will start to get worn out, or the beautiful car model will age with time. This means that in this is a realm of appearances, and I know that appearance can be deceptive. Things change and fade away, but the forms are considered eternal and unchanging. In the form realm, concepts are grasps by reason compared to the field of the things where senses grasp them.
Platos considered most of his philosophies as forms, and he explained the reality of human existence through his beliefs. He thought the world around him to be very crude, and this only meant that purity could only exist in the next life.
I find it interesting how people can connect objects which are not automatically identical to the compatible ilk. Does this mean that we can understand precise meanings such as what is glass arise? Without necessary thinking about human Reality, but when told to consider justice in human existence, there will be standard proof of human life due to these notions two fundamental aspects of realms of Reality.
To Plato, it was essential to -culturally examine human concepts since the two realms can be contracted in the context of being immanent or transcendent. Plato state that he considers the world of the forms as his Reality world, meaning that there is little more than the imitation of human Reality.He believed that for an imperfect thing to exist in the sensible realm mainly, this means there must be a corresponding absolute perfect form that can be found in the reality realm.
At some point, Plato felt the need to elaborate more on the metaphysical system. He was trying to respond to numerous relativism of sophists who were continuously arguing about what’s right or false, good and evil. Plato explained that this type of relativism would lead to the death of his philosophies, which to him, contained the legitimate attempts to salvage human Reality to save his philosophical enterprise. Plato devised a plan of truth and goodness that would be independent of individuals’ perceptions of truth and that of virtue. However, he needed to anchor his concepts in a transcendent realm in the world of forms where all individuals will gin legitimate ideas of human Reality and existence.
Platos metaphysics may be hard to grasp, but when explained using the analogies ot makes it easier to understand whether purposes are fixed or not purposes are fixed or not. In the first of his similarities, Plato compares the form of and the sun. He explains that just as the sun provides humans with necessary light for them to see the sensible realm, so does the path of righteousness provide human Reality with an intellectual view to see pure forms. Plato believes that just like how the sun changes things into more sensible ways, so does the kind of good. The philosopher believes that all humans should lay their foundation for understanding in the two realms. However, they should have a choice to choose which domain they want since every human has its existence. Also, according to him, only one domain contains the principle of Reality and the truth since it the order of the universe to be the source of all law, beauty, and intelligibility.
According to Plato’s philosophies, everything that is below the universe’s horizontal line represents the sensible world to him. This means the worlds of forms. To my understanding, I believe he means that for us humans to proceed, the right path to the form world is from bottom to top through the images of higher form from the lowest level to the highest. Plato later divides the universe images by introducing the upper vertical line. He states that anything from the left side of the line represents various dimensions of human Reality within the sensible world and the world of forms.and with everything on the right presenting particular concepts that are needed to grasps the present practical things.
Do things happen for a reason? Do we determine the cause? Is the right determined for us?
The main discussion in the paper is about the metaphysics of Plato about the worlds and form versus the sensible world and wisdom. However, all this discussion elaborate on how true it is to say that thing happen for a reason. You see it all about how humans remain fixated by the sensible realm, which is filled with impedances and imperfection, in this realm, as discussed. There is no hope that individuals will attain their tru happiness. Only by using Plato’s understanding could humans break free of the illusion created by the material things and otherworldly leisure. Humans should aim at grasping other firms form the world, which may include truth and goodness, which I agree with Plato that they are the main form of happiness and morality for any individual.
Conclusion.
In summary, Plato’s philosophy build up upon the insights of human Reality, especially our intellectual capacity. Plato may act as a mentor to many in today’s generation since he sticks with the belief that virtue was a vital key in accessing good life. The philosopher’s insight will depend on how an individual views it and also how one views it. He also shares an intellectual view of the world, whether in regards to the universe situations, events, or circumstances. He always expresses his sense of opinion in an ideal content way.
Additionally, his view of universe order is controlled by his philosophy that talks about the realms and all his saying have excellent relations that reveal the true meaning of what he meant. Overall, Plato’s main standing point was that the form world would be his primary way of ensuring that his virtue and goodness remain grounded for good. His primary mission will be to live an exemplary life that could be eternal and incorruptible.