Pros and Cons of Creating a New Federal Agency to Handle Domestic Intelligence

Pros and Cons of Creating a New Federal Agency to Handle Domestic Intelligence

Introduction

Since that attack that occurred on September eleven, the security system has been keen to ensure such incidences do not repeat or happen in the US. The congress decided to make the FBI in the state as the primary agency in tackling and ensuring all the domestic intelligence responsibilities are handled by the FBI. However, this might be challenging in one way or another, and sometimes might be advantageous to the country. This review explores the cons and pros of dedicating these responsibilities to the FBI versus creating a new agency to manage local intelligence in the state.

Adding the Roles of Intelligence to FBI’s Responsibilities

By adding the roles of intelligence to the FBI, the US government managed to save time and resources needed in creating a new agency to tackle intelligence. Using the FBI would be a significant step as they already are established and have knowledge in dealing with security and intelligence; no training is required here. However, there will be disruptions of responsibilities within the FBI, who will be forced to set aside special staff to deal with intelligence. Work will or may overwhelm the FBI officers, dealing with investigations, collecting, reporting, and managing emergency issues arising from the intelligence data collected. Splitting tasks might be tiresome and therefore cause a lack of mission within the FBI. Funds allocated to the FBI might not be sufficient to support intelligence collection, creating disruption.

Pros of Creating a New Federal Agency

A new agency might address present problems affecting intelligence in a swift way, bringing in much-needed changes in ensuring policies are implemented according to the intelligence collected. There will be clarity of functioning as work will be collecting and analyzing intelligence data without having disruptions. Coordination of data among the agency will be done effectively compared to the FBI, who do not relate well with other bodies within the security system. There will be diversified recruitment of officers who will bring in better and effective ways of intelligence collection in the state. A stand-alone new agency will have commanding power to request funding from the state government, making it easier compared to working from the FBI section., and that brings in greater success rates in intelligence collection, implementation, and application of policies in the country. The collaboration with other agencies will be higher and effective because the new agency will have respect from other departments regarding intelligence matters. There will be more people, departments, and diversified agencies working together, more hands-on work, which is vital in ensuring results are delivered effectively.

Cons of Creating a New Federal Agency

Crucial resources are required to ensure the new agency is functioning properly, and this takes time vetting, recruiting, and giving directions to the staff on what should be done. There might be no transparency in selecting the best candidates for the job, with some people selecting their friends and or relatives who are not qualified for the tasks ahead. Time is wasted before the agency can start functioning fully, as there will be disruptions of other organizations involved in intelligence collection. Politics might influence the new agency, creating confusion, and omitting the primary mission of intelligence collection. The different visions of officers in the new agency could lead to the slow implementation of intelligence information collected. The rifts are creating delays due to misunderstanding, personal interests, and conflicting views. It is generally expensive to create a new organization and make it fully functional.