Race, Gender & Class Connectivity
These three aspects introduce sociology in the community that provides a clear pathway to trace the interconnected ideas of race, gender, and social classes. The author’s perception of the race, gender, and social class connection have been recounted in as personal and professional understanding of the three aspects, each teaching about their challenges and rewards to an individual and generally the whole society (Belkhir et al., p.120). The author developed these ideologies to draw a fruitful exertion to balance between the notional and imaginative pieces in the process of presenting collaboration and feminist. The other aspect that the author touches on how race and gender scraps are left to define ordinary human formality similar to the women, which tries to derive political and economic material of the elite preserved.
The author has used two main ideas to intellectualize the whole discussion. It has looked at ways in which race, gender, and class can be conceptualized as one category of analysis. Secondly, in need of building a coalition that is essential for social exchange, there is a need to create restrictions against gender oppressions that cater to the surpass obstacles created by our experiences on race, gender and social classes (Belkhir et al., p.120). This meant that to be able to address those ideas, there was a need to acquire new theories that could shape all the aspects to cater to all groups. The institutional, symbolic, and individual structures offer a useful model that grasps the entire issues discussed in the journal, which resembles gender oppression.
Entirely, there is a need to shift our discourse far from addictive strategies of oppression that depend on dichotomous thinking, which have been evaluated by looking at abuse in three-dimensional ways; institutional, symbolic, and individual dimension of oppression (Mann et al., p.3). Then later, the transcend oppression created by our own experience and barrios have been redirected by looking at better relationships like differences of supremacy and pleasure, which brings social change among ourselves.
Generally, the author’s ideas were to bring about new ways of thinking and acting. One should take it that the degree of inequality in our lives has some unquestioned sense of entitlement concerned. Therefore, this calls upon an individual to make a viewpoint, drop the social differences, and scrutinize ourselves to tackle the most difficult situations towards achieving the complacence position of our state in society.