Rawls philosophy
Based on these reading, I am inclined to side with Rawls philosophy. This decision is informed by various reasons. In a Theory of Justice Rawls recommends a conspicuous and authentic relationship of liberty and impartiality, activated by a sanctioned and democratic belief in individual possibilities. Enraged by the social differences between the haves and the haves not, impartials criticized the traditional free economy of Locke and Adam Smith for dwelling on civil liberties while ignoring the position of the ordinary citizen. Also he proposes a concept which demands that we augment economic presumption for the ordinary citizen.
Also, Rawls suggests a conceiving of fairness he calls “Justice as fairness” that devotes to both the human rights we relate with traditional freedom, and to an unbiased perfection of equitability dissemination customarily related to socialists and revolutionary democratic culture. Justice as fairness, Rawls says, that it focuses to impact a reunion of freedom and equality. His work has provided the groundwork for all successive debates about essential interrogation of social justice. Rawls main point is that we should renounce the belief that our economic structure is a competition that intends to compensate the haves