reasons why pictures are more impactful to the audience than data graphs
This refers to the representation of data in a graphical way, which involves images that communicate the relationship between the represented data (Nocke, Sterzel, Böttinger & Wrobel, 2018). There is a various paradox for data visualization including the Simpson’s paradox, Charles Minard visualization, and the eye satellite visualization data. A documentary is a popular form of literature which shows significant historical events. Photos taken for documentaries are made in the same field and professionalism. These tell the reason why these photos look like those in the documentary (Nocke et al., 2018). This paper explores the reasons why pictures are more impactful to the audience than data graphs. It also tells what the functions of data visualization should serve in communication.
People prefer photos more than they prefer data graphs. The reason been photos are more appealing, and anyone can interpret them as compared to data graphs. Secondly, data graphs may require specific knowledge for one to understand, so illiterate people can not use it. Photos can be easy to understand because one only needs visual ability. Thirdly, t is easy for photos to achieve an emotional connection as compared to data graphs (Wang, Yu & Ma, 2016) Many people would prefer visual evidence than I claim because they want to make sure it subject is precisely what they saw. People always want to quantify by seeing rather than what is being requested.
Graphics are used when it is a lot of data to be expressed. Many companies use graphics because they can present a lot of data within a single space. Only the interpreter can understand what the company says. In conclusion, data visualization is used to communicate information clearly and an insufficient way to its users. It provides an accessible way in which a person can see and understand the trends and patterns of the data.