reducing the use of hazardous materials and chemicals, having a negative impact on the environment
Purpose
The team would be tasked to reduce the use of hazardous materials and chemicals, having a negative impact on the environment.
Strategies to minimize resource use
The team will adopt strategies such as preventive measures to avoid cleaning up the mess caused by hazardous materials and chemicals (Liroff, 2019). Also, the team spearheads at minimizing energy use, thus embark on the utilization of renewable forms of energy. Besides, safer solvents would be used to avert the impact caused by tragedies. As such, chemicals would utilize explicit designs that minimize their toxicity to the environment and health.
Strategies to reduce toxic materials
Prevention serves as the best strategy to reduce the number of toxic materials and unsafe chemicals into the environment. Also, source reduction is highly viable since it eliminates waste before being created and released into the environment (Liroff, 2019). As such, toxic levels are greatly reduced hence developing a healthy environment. Lastly, recycling helps reduce toxic materials by converting wastes into materials and objects which can be reused. Don't use plagiarised sources.Get your custom essay just from $11/page
Benefits of utilizing the life cycle approach to management
The life cycle approach helps make desirable choices relative to every stakeholder in the product’s life cycle. As such, every member has a distinct role to play based on their impact on the environment, society, and economy. However, there is a need to evaluate the impact of every life cycle state to help critical decisions on the production and consumption patterns. Besides, the life cycle serves to implement organizational strategies, policies, and patterns to the best of individual competence. Lastly, the product life cycle helps designers and providers make key decisions for having long-term viability.
Communication plan
The diverse stakeholder groups will be identified as critical members of the environment before starting the strategic planning process. Hence, the plan helps outline key members who will be impacted by the project in the long-term (Bryson & Alston, 2010). Secondly, the stakeholder representatives will be identified to outline individuals to be communicated to as the representative of the stakeholder group. Also, a communication system will be developed to solicit the feedback system through the use of calendar steps to actualize the action plan. Afterward, the feedback would be incorporated into the strategic planning process to articulate concerns based on set priorities. Finally, reporting back would be necessary during the communication and implementation plan to track events that led to success.
Procedures to implement policy initiatives
The earth-friendly policy initiative is implemented by assigning key roles and responsibilities to each stakeholder. Besides, adequate resources are allocated to all aspects of management operations. As such, the policy initiative would be implemented by articulating their shared values to establish clear metrics as required to track a development project (Liroff, 2019). Thus, earth-friendly products continuously aim at reducing the environmental impact caused by their own operations throughout the whole life cycle. Finally, earth-friendly products have to comply with existing environmental legislation to spur its sustainability going to the future.
Benchmark indicators
Sustainable benchmark indicators such as air quality would be used to create a link between the society, economy, and environment. Also, the use of natural resources would be used as a benchmark indicator to achieve long-term sustainable goals in the environment. Similarly, education levels are vital as benchmarking indicators to outline the literacy levels of the target audience (Bryson & Alston, 2010). In most cases, education characterizes the poverty and crime levels exemplified by a particular group of people. Finally, sustainability and community development serve as an excellent benchmark indicator to exemplify an individual’s ability to protect the environment.
Key responsibilities
The CEO is mandated to develop a clear business plan that outlines the firm’s mission and goals going into the future. Also, the general manager plays a critical role in developing an interconnected management skill needed to increase value (Dwyer & Hopwood, 2013). On the other hand, the policymaker gathers information through research and consultation to develop a desirable course of action. In addition, the sustainable development officer is tasked to develop and assist in the promotion and coordination of sustainable developments. Likewise, the officer is required to provide environmental sustainability through the use of relevant planning initiatives. Finally, the shareholders responsible for the stability and growth based on daily business operations.
Feedback form
Feedback can be collected through phone calls, transactional emails, suggestion boards, or long form-based surveys to provide questions aimed at getting stakeholders’ response.
The PDCA cycle
The PDCA cycle provides a logical sequence required to show a continuous quality improvement strategy. The first step being the planning stage practically and theoretically helps plan ahead based on what needs to be achieved (Dwyer & Hopwood, 2013). Secondly, the do stage serves as the execution step, where Deming continuously reiterates the importance of scientific values characterizing an investigation. The third stage is referred to as the check phase and helps monitor progress relative to customer feedback. Finally, the active stage allows for the implementation needed to acquire new knowledge to actualize change. As such, the step seeks to develop a broader understanding of business operations.
References
Bryson, J. M., & Alston, F. K. (2010). Creating and implementing your strategic plan: A workbook for public and nonprofit organizations (Vol. 1). John Wiley & Sons.
Dwyer, J., & Hopwood, N. (2013). Management strategies and skills (Vol. 10, p. 240). in Australia by McGraw-Hill Education (Australia) Pty Ltd Level 2, 82 Waterloo Road, North Ryde NSW 2113.
Liroff, R. (2019). How Companies Are Committing to Reduce Toxic Footprints. Retrieved 23 February 2020, from https://www.greenbiz.com/blog/2009/11/30/how-companies-are-committing-reduce-toxic-footprints