Research on the history and evolution of case management

Research on the history and evolution of case management

Case management evolution and history

Case management within the criminal justice system has evolved over the years. Strategies and practice range from various settings. Traditional case management entails social or mental health workers who coordinate consistent reintegration activities. It reduces case relapse hence enabling inmates to get back into the community quickly. The evolution of case management is dated back to the development of professional social work and public human services (Tahan & Treiger, 2017). During the early nineteenth century, non-governmental organizations provided services to the poor and needy workers. The current organized case management is as a result of the efforts of more initial non-formal organizations.

The evolution of the issues is traced back to the earlier civilization period. It is commonly attributed to a specific approach within the movements of the nineteenth century. Notably, the determination of the mentally disabled during the period needed mental health social workers to come up with better means to handle the clients (Rothman & Sager, 2016). The workers ensured the clients had a connection to community social service agencies that adequately monitored the client.

Similarly, the increasing population of inmates sent to society correction and monitoring increased rapidly in society. The pressure made more changes within the correction systems and the criminal justice system.

Schools of thought and significant issues during the evolution period

            Evolution reflects the changing public policy environment. This indicated the acknowledgment of the challenges older adults and caregivers living with serious illness face within the criminal justice system. Development of numerous methods for financing and offering services over the care services required. Case management has increasingly become a crucial component for elderly individuals with health problems. Chronic illness affects more than eighty percent of the elderly in the national health care services. The massive demand for health care services has created a problem within the sectors that take care of elderly citizens. This leads to the need for better case management (Norcross, VandenBos & Freedheim, 2017).

Judicial attention began playing a critical role in the development of case management. Courts determined that the lack of movement from institutions to the community was the cause of a lack of public safety. The deinstitutionalization movement radically contributed to the change in the human service system. The group advocated for a shift from under a single roof model of service delivery to support and care system in the community. The adverse effects of failure to attend to the needs of the movement lead to widespread attention during the 1970s.

In the late 1970s, a group of professionals and advocates joined to fight for the issues of persons with disabilities. The efforts made the federal government provide support money and federal state legislations. The policies enabled the development of services to meet the personal needs of the clients. Congress passed a bill during 1974, which identified case management as a priority service component. The law stated that each state receiving federal money for developmental disabilities would allocate a considerable amount of the resources to the priority service of limitations (Ashery, 2018).

Changing roles and functions over time

            Jurisdiction across the nation has adopted case management approaches to eliminate the lack of homes and unemployment. Case management is currently used by offenders arrested on probation and parole that require mental health treatment. The evolution over time has seen the current system approach connect offenders reintegrating back to the society to medical and mental health systems in addition to social service (Rothman & Sager, 2016).

The evolution of case management has improved the services offered to clients over time. The roles entail getting the client into the rehabilitation method, determining the offender’s requirements, monitoring client progress, connecting client to relevant services as well as representing the inmate objectively. The social service in the correction system needs adequate management systems in tackling more assignments compared to the ones initially handled by earlier case managers.

Current case managers need to issue clients with informal guidance for the procedures involved. The evolution of the system has enabled correctional case management programs to prevent the offender from treatment roles. Additionally, the changes introduced practitioners such as drug counselors, health providers, social service providers, and assault program counselors (Norcross, VandenBos & Freedheim, 2017).

Successful case management entails monitoring and inspection of the challenges and provides consistent service to inmates reintegrating into the community. The new methods provide the best use of sanctions. The introduction of the measuring program is the latest change and the successful provision of employment to the offenders. Moreover, well-designed programs reduce the burden of the case manager, thus, improvement of performance within criminal justice.

Impacts of changing correctional services

The main objective of service delivery entails the facilitation of functional and cost-efficient relationships among service providers. It ensures the correct integration of medical, psychological, and social services to ensure proper service delivery to the client. The changing correctional facilities have led to including clients and their families and several agencies. The improved changes involve community agencies, legal, financial, and employers within the reintegration process.

Additionally, it is used to coordinate functions designed to connect clients with services based on their requirements. The improvement of correctional methods has led to the recognition that the numerous systems of service delivery are challenging for the elderly, disabled persons and their families. The changes led to the need for coordination of care. Case managers have clinical and financial independence. Continuous changes have improved the nature of services offered to clients by the managers to help in the reintegration (Tahan & Treiger, 2017).

Elderly and seriously sick individuals need health care programs by fragmented health facilities. Moreover, social services comprise the same elements which entail screening, comprehensive review, and monitoring (Ashery, 2018). Outreach services are designed in the current correctional approaches within case management. This is an effort to find people who may require immediate mental treatment within social service delivery. This enables individuals with needs are identified.

In conclusion, case management is the solution to numerous health and social delivery systems. The practice has significant elements that vary with the setting. Case managers help with locating and coordinating the range of services required by their clients. Options of health service delivery vary depending on the care level needed by the client. Case management functions show the level of professionalism, client care, and balancing advocacy and cost reduction ability of the chosen agency.

References

Ashery, R. (2018). Progress and issues in case management (9th ed., pp. 34-67). U.S. Dept. of Health and Human Services.

Norcross, J., VandenBos, G., & Freedheim, D. (2017). History of case management. American Psychological Association.

Rothman, J.,  & Sager, J., (2016). Case management (pp. 45-74). Allyn and Bacon.

Tahan, H., & Treiger, T. (2017). core evolution for case management. Wolters Kluwer.