Science vs. Religion(Conflict between Science and Religion)
In Inherit The Wind, the lawyer Henry Drummond defending Cates makes a better logical argument than Brady. Brady had the assumption of being right since he quoted the bible and failed to provide ideas as compared to Drummond. He questioned the truth of the facts presented before the court challenging the reason his client was denied the free will, yet Brady argued every man had free will. Also, Brady was only interested in the truth other than the facts behind the truth. For instance, he says he is not concerned with the age of the rock but the rock of ages.
When it comes to debating matters of deeply held beliefs, logic has no sense. The issue becomes a thing of proving which is right or wrong though all is right. It ends turning the argument into a conflict of either side by proving each other wrong.
It is hard to use logic to understand spirituality. Rational thinking informs the applicability of things and questions every aspect of it, while spirituality tends to explain why some things happen without concern with the applicability of the process. Logic cannot tell spirituality since it tries to explain the purpose of something while spirituality entails faith in something not seen.
Evolution and Christian theory bring conflict between science and religion. Science looks for evidence to get answers, while faith looks for evidence to support an appropriate response. Also, when an event occurs, religion views it as a miracle, while scientists will look for a natural cause. However, to avoid the conflict between scientists and religious people should learn to acknowledge divergent ways of reasoning and not seeing the other as wrong.