Strengths and Weaknesses based on Barclays and Deutsche Bank
Strengths
Barclays and Deutsche Bank networking for the delivery is robust, and they offer multi-channel for delivery networking. The banks have Branches, ATMs, online banking facilities, and on phone banking facilities. The Banks’ employees are very enthusiastic about their work. Both banks have operational competence. The financial resources available at the two banks are excellent (Wójcik et al., 2018). Their operations are well expanded. The banks’ diversified set-ups include retail investment, consumer lending, place funding, and commercial banking.
Fiscal public exhibition of the two banks takes the aid of engineering for enhancing their banking services as they respond electronically to the queries of customers. The banks offer commercial facilities to customers by applying information engineering. The banks supply online security so that thefts and frauds will be prohibited. For this security, the two banks are using different packages. Fraud instances are avoided by using the packages.
Barclays and Deutsche Bank are geographically diversified, and they perform their concern operations in various states. Branches of the two banks are widely spread all over the world. The two banks take the benefit from the geographic variegation, and they spread their hazards extensively across the states and get the advantage of the financial schemes of graduated tables.
Weaknesses
Barclays and Deutsche Bank trade name images have been affected negatively by the unethical deeds and improper publicity through advertisement (Wójcik et al., 2018). More disputes and queries arose due to the trade name images of the two banks. Investors value ethical matters, and after these unhealthy deeds, many stakeholders drew their investments back from the banks.
Furthermore, Barclays and Deutsche Bank cost on income is high as compared to other financial institutions. The two banks failed to balance between data engineering, concern processes and trade name (Wójcik et al., 2018). They did not derive success in the intended synergisms and outcomes.