Summary Essay
Zi Lin’s essay is not merely an article but a piece of art that never possess any images. However, from just studying his work, your thoughts go on a journey for the reason of his work. Besides, the way he quotes the sources he requires us to talk about is performed in a sophisticated way. Thus, this implies to us how quoting should not look awkward nor disorganized. If you look closely, you will realize that the quoting is embedded in the body of the paper. For instance, when Zi Lin likens his associations to his original nation, he quotes an expression conversing around how Hoffman feels a similar manner around home Cracow.
In this essay, I appreciate and feel somehow concerned about Young-Jin Park opening section. The first paragraph is honestly overwhelming in how it swiftly defines the underlying forces of a fascinating difficult whose repercussions the paper explores. Also, the use of dual movement sentence outline alongside extra sentences system enhance a lot in the means of both consistency and construction beside the complexity of the essay.
Both Young-Jin Park and Zi Lin are arranging their work systematically whereby their paragraphs are not too short nor too long. There are also increased usage of imagery by the two writers in their essay. I am likewise interested in the common use of conjunction words like moreover, likewise, besides and others in both essays. When you consider the two essay, the two authors arrange their idea very well to make them flow systematically. Similarly, both authors are using euphemism language thus, showing courtesy in their essay. Therefore, I would wish to apply all those features mentioned above and many others applied by both Young-Jin and Zi Lin writers in my work.