This essay has been submitted by a student. This is not an example of the work written by professional essay writers.
Gender

The investigation process

Pssst… we can write an original essay just for you.

Any subject. Any type of essay. We’ll even meet a 3-hour deadline.

GET YOUR PRICE

writers online

The investigation process

Investigations are processes used to correct information and realities in a given criminal event. A criminal examination is a way toward decisions which realities to an occasion assess whether the suspected members in the crime have taken the criminal operations and whether the information underpins accommodation of the work to a delegate of the lawful framework investigator to the court and ramifications for the members in the event. An investigator may start extra insightful exercises in readiness to accuse the members of wrongdoings. Examinations are reality discovering missions that are basic to common and objective society. A religious society may rather toss the assumed member in the water and check whether they buoy or sink.

The investigation process is important to the criminal and even to the judge administrating justice so that all the people involved in the crime will be judged rightly. It is the right of the suspect to undergo the investigation process in order to Make sure justice is done.  All the producers should be followed to the letter to ensure that; ensures a reasonable procedure in all hearings since this is the time both parties are given the permission to speak themselves out, and the lawyer should be keen at this point since this the vital part of the investigation. Ensures equivalent treatment under the law; all the participants in the invents should be treated fairly regardless of their gender, race, or age.

Accommodates a pretrial hearing by a fantastic jury in lawful offense cases, the participants of the criminal events should be presented before a jury and allowed to be heard and defend himself before the jury to ensure justice has taken place. Outlaws a second preliminary for similar wrongdoing the suspects are done for the second time to make sure they repeat what they said for the first time, or they changed the first information, and the is the time the truth can be know because if the suspect changes the truth will be known. Shields suspects from responding to addresses which could be utilized against them, and they are still given time to defend themselves ensures reasonable procedures when individuals are undermined by lost life, freedom, or property by the administration, the jury has to be very keen when hearing the case and judging the criminal especially if the criminal has to lose their lives, properties or be jailed. Guarantees’ remuneration for individuals whose property is taken by the administration, the law should make sure that the individual properties which were used during an investigation are returned before the law. Shields individuals from outlandish police searches and seizures, this ensures that all the data is corrected since the data will be corrected correctly when the search is done. Sets necessities for court orders,   all the necessities should be carried on in order to make sure justice is to all.  Requires a quick and open preliminary by a fair-minded jury since if the jury makes a small mistake, they may end up jailing an innocent person. Requires somebody blamed for wrongdoing to be educated regarding the charges and proof, the investigation procedure makes sure that the suspect who now will become a criminal is taught on the chances they may undergo out of the crime they committed. Necessitates that the blamed be available when witnesses affirm against him/her, accommodates the charged to have an attorney and call observers in safeguard, the investigation requires the courts to set sensible and predictable bail. Investigation requires the courts to suit the sentence to the wrongdoing; at last, the criminal is judged of their crime.

References

Dediu, D. (2018). Protection of Fundamental Rights in the Light of the Directive regarding the European Investigation Order. In Conf. Int’l Dr. (p. 298).

Kesic, T., & Zarkovic, M. (2017). Managerial Role of the Public Prosecutor in Serbian Pre-Investigation Proceedings: Myth or Reality. JE-Eur. Crim. L., 63.

  Remember! This is just a sample.

Save time and get your custom paper from our expert writers

 Get started in just 3 minutes
 Sit back relax and leave the writing to us
 Sources and citations are provided
 100% Plagiarism free
error: Content is protected !!
×
Hi, my name is Jenn 👋

In case you can’t find a sample example, our professional writers are ready to help you with writing your own paper. All you need to do is fill out a short form and submit an order

Check Out the Form
Need Help?
Dont be shy to ask