The need for universal health care

The need for universal health care

Thesis and introduction

Everybody has a right to access

excellent and efficient medical attention. Medical attention should be availed to everybody without a basis on their ethnic groups, social classes, and their religion. Nevertheless, this is not always the case: people get medical attention depending on the various base. Social classes, education, races, beliefs play a vital role in the type of medical services one is going to get.

Everybody is supposed to access health care universally without any discrimination depending on any basis. The funny bit is that the kind of illness we get contracted with does not select who to attack or who not to attack (Yates, R. (2009). The funny bit about us humans is that when it comes to treatment, we all, if not all, most of us always become selective. The health organizations, that is, the hospitals, the clinics, and the pharmacies, sort us according to our statuses. The professionals and the analysts are not an exception, for they are always very good at being selective on how they offer their services. Being a minority in the world has and will potentially consistently been a battle. With the economy being in hoaxes and the lowest pay permitted by law turns out to be a profession, minorities have numerous issues that society is unconscious, particularly in medicinal services. An enormous percent of minorities are most of the laborers of America, which requires a large portion of the social insurance circulation. Be that as it may, would they say they are getting the best possible access to social insurance, and remedy get too dependent on their ethnicity/race? Segregation and bigotry keep on being a piece of the unbalancing disparity in the public arena and have unfavorably influenced minority populaces and the social insurance framework all in all. Investigating a portion of the racial inconsistencies in social insurance among Americans are changes in both need and access. Minorities are destined to require social insurance yet are less inclined to get medicinal services administrations, including appropriate medication, to get to their families and relatives.

Biasness is the other key factor affecting universal health care in that hea

lth care is provided in accordance with the various basis: A question which we should always ask ourselves is that, will the health care improve our lives if it is biased? We all need to reason together and make sure that our doings are relevant to our health care and the health of others. We should be able to follow individual ethics, which should always be a way of a peaceful and accepted way of living. These ethics are generally our beliefs: since ethics on health care are discussed in articles and international conferences without any explicit consideration of culture, we all suffer at a point. Violation of human rights when it comes to health care is another challenge that is so disastrous and is becoming a common thing in our health organizations. (Bulletin of the World Health Organization, 91, 847-852).Violations or lack of attention to human rights can have serious health consequences. Overt or implicit discrimination in the delivery of health services – both within the health workforce and between health workers and service users – acts as a powerful barrier to health services, and contributes to poor quality care. Infringements of human rights add to and fuel unexpected weakness, yet for some, incorporating individuals with incapacities, indigenous populaces, ladies living with HIV, sex laborers, individuals who use drugs, transgender and intersex individuals, the social insurance setting presents a danger of elevated presentation to human rights mishandles – including coercive or constrained treatment and techniques.

Everybody needs health care regardless of their statuses; no one is to be discriminated on any basis when it comes to getting treatment and any other type of health care. Social class is gathering of individuals together and concurring them status in the dependent on their social and financial remaining in the general public. This type of social stratification is obligated to   Weber speculations Dye, C., Reeder, J. C., & Terry, R. F. (2013). To Marx, social class is controlled by two separate gatherings. The proprietor of the processing plant, ranches, and crude material, and their workers are working for the creation of Senior and Viveash. This means that the social classes have full play on the health care of all the countries in the world. This should be highly objected because we are human beings, and when it comes to sickness, it doesn’t select on who to settle on and who not to settle on. The government should have a hand in this, but in most cases, it fails.

Sometimes it feels like people should get health attention as per their abilities. Hospitals should always be selected as per the knowledge of people on the basis of finance; this is because hospitals are run at costs, and people admitted there should always have the ability to support their bills. If this is not the case, the government has to do something to cater to it. Human services costs overpower government spending plans (Dye, C., Reeder, J. C., & Terry, R. F. (2013). For instance, some Canadian regions spend practically 40% of their financial limits on social insurance. The administration may restrain those administrations with a low likelihood of progress. This incorporates drugs for uncommon conditions and costly finish of-life care. In the US, care for patients over the most recent six years of life makes up one-fourth of the Medicare spending plan.

The audience and ethos

The target groups are the whole country at large but necessary for the people who are to get medical attention. The less enlightened people are the most vulnerable to be missed on their rights on universal health care. It is essential to make people aware of their rights when it comes to seeking medical services. People should always be mindful of their rights, and no one should misuse them in any possible way. For you to understand this, i need to consider the ethos part of this topic. Being well familiar with this topic, we need to get our information and knowledge on our rights through;

*Through research

*Through reading articles on universal health care

*Attending comprehensive health conferences.

pathos

As it is well known i need to ask myself questions as you ask yourself the same questions so that we can be on the same side; what does universal health care mean to us, what is needed to achieve it, what should be offered to us on this lane, then we will be able to answer ourselves vices. Fundamental wellbeing administrations (counting for HIV, tuberculosis, intestinal sickness, non-transmittable infections and emotional wellbeing, sexual and conceptive wellbeing, and kid wellbeing) ought to be accessible to all who need them. universal wellbeing inclusion implies that all individuals approach the wellbeing administrations they need (anticipation, advancement, treatment, recovery, and palliative consideration) without the danger of money related hardship while paying for them. (Rosenau, P. V., & Lako, C. J. (2008). This requires a proficient wellbeing framework that gives the whole populace access to high-quality administrations, wellbeing laborers, drugs, and advancements. It additionally requires a financing framework to shield individuals from money related hardship and impoverishment from medicinal services costs.

Logos

Finally, the logistic way of conveying this information is through; first, you become familiar with the knowledge, that is, through reading widely and going for various conferences about universal health care. This information can be presented in an orderly manner through lectures, writing articles, representations, social media, etc. in a well-arranged manner

Conclusion

We all have to agree that when it comes to matters on health care, social classes, ethnic groups, and religion play a very crucial role in the kind of services people are going to get. This should not be the case; we should be able to access health care without being subjected to any basis.

Reference

Yates, R. (2009). Universal health care and the removal of user fees. The Lancet, 373(9680), 2078-2081.

Tulenko, K., Medal, S., Afzal, M. M., Frymus, D., Oshin, A., Pate, M., … & Zodpey, S. (2013). Community health workers for universal health-care coverage: from fragmentation to synergy. Bulletin of the World Health Organization, 91, 847-852.

Dye, C., Reeder, J. C., & Terry, R. F. (2013). Research for universal health coverage.

Rosenau, P. V., & Lako, C. J. (2008). An experiment with regulated competition and individual mandates for universal health care: the new Dutch health insurance system. Journal of Health Politics, Policy, and Law, 33(6), 1031-1055.