This essay has been submitted by a student. This is not an example of the work written by professional essay writers.
Law

The three-strikes law

Pssst… we can write an original essay just for you.

Any subject. Any type of essay. We’ll even meet a 3-hour deadline.

GET YOUR PRICE

writers online

The three-strikes law

The three-strikes law involves life sentence if a person is convicted with a severe crime more than twice; for example, it increases the person prison sentence. On March 7th, 1994, the United States Justice Department first implemented the three strikes law to reduce crime. For example, twenty-eight states in the United States have implemented the three strikes law in that in a few countries a person convicted under the three strikes law is referred to as persistent offender. In contrast, in Missouri, they are regarded as a prior and persistent offender. The paper discusses the impact of the three-strikes law and how it deters crime as follows; increased length of prison stays and crime rates since 1994.

Increased length of a prison stay. The three-strikes law has increased the average length of stay in jail. In 1994 the average time served was 21 months but due to the implementation of the three-strikes law, it grew to 25 months which is 19% increase (Huigens & Chinea, 2018, p. 22). The rise in the length of prison stay and the implementation of the three-strikes law has dramatically reduced the rate of crime in all the states.

Crime rates since 1994. The California crime index measured the overall crime rates, for example, the crime rate declined between 1991 and 1994 by 10% even before the passage of the three-strikes law, and between 1994 and 1999 it reduced by 43% (Huigens & Chinea, 2018, p. 30). It is important to note that the three-strikes law deters crime.

In conclusion, the three-strikes law is not a poorly written law which clogs up the prison system, but it deters crime, for example, this evident through the California crime index from 1994-2003 the crime rate significantly reduced.

 

Works Cited

Huigens, K. and Chinea, D., 2018. ‘Three Strikes’ Laws and Apprendi’s Irrational, Inequitable Exception for Recidivism.

 

  Remember! This is just a sample.

Save time and get your custom paper from our expert writers

 Get started in just 3 minutes
 Sit back relax and leave the writing to us
 Sources and citations are provided
 100% Plagiarism free
error: Content is protected !!
×
Hi, my name is Jenn 👋

In case you can’t find a sample example, our professional writers are ready to help you with writing your own paper. All you need to do is fill out a short form and submit an order

Check Out the Form
Need Help?
Dont be shy to ask