Voter suppression impacts

Voter suppression impacts

Voter suppression is the procedure employed to impact election results by restricting particular groups from participating in voting (Norris, Garnett, et al., 2015). Voter suppression in the US relates to the allegations concerning distinct illegal and legal efforts practiced to restrict eligible voters from exercising their rights. This paper entails giving a legal issue statement in the US.

Legal issue statement

Are voting rights under suppression in the US as states enact voter suppression laws? These laws result in big issues for eligible voters by causing them to struggle to participate in the most primary social responsibility in the constitution. From 2008, states in the US have enacted measures to restrict the minority groups to practice their voting responsibility.

Voting Rights Act of 1965

In this paper, I will use the 1965 voting rights act that is enacted in the Federal Legislation to prohibit voter suppression in voting.

Resolutions of voting rights act in the United States

The voting rights act was resolute to remove the discriminative voting laws in the United States. In the US, voting rights were limited in most states to white males. Over time, voting rights were given to racial minorities (Keyssar, 2019). During the previous centuries that is the 19th and 20th centuries, the Southern States passed a law that suppressed the poor racial minorities. The law was Jim Crow Laws, which included the tests for literacy. Such tactics later were declared illegal in the publication of the Voting Act of Rights of 1965. Following the Supreme Court decision to remove section 4 of the voting rights act, discriminatory voter ID laws arose in 2013, which did not favor voters from poor African-Americans (Carney, 2016).

Later in Texas, voter ID’s having the passport, military identification, and license were realized to be deliberate discriminatory. Based on this, laws of election for the state were reduced to be controlled by the US Department of Justice lead by Attorney General Jeff (Scacco, Lawrence el. at. 2016). This department still held support for the later IDs laws. However, Jeff was accused of discrimination against black voters by Scot. A federal judge in Wisconsin realized that the discriminative voter ID law resulted in actual cases of denying citizens the voting rights, which negatively affected the elections, specifically in minority races. Apart from the introduction of rigid requirements for the voter ID, the law reduced on early voting, deserved that citizens stay in a ward for 28 days before the election, and restricted absentee votes from being emailed to the ballot.

President Donald Trump, back in 2017, set up a Presidential Advisory Commission with the intention to restrict election fraud. Critics argue that the actual role of the commission was voter suppression (Chadwick, 2017). The system of crosscheck embraced by the commission is in place to check for double voter registration, and researchers from Harvard University argue that for every double registration, the algorithms of crosscheck give at least 200 false positives. This made the commission leader Kobach, to be sued by the American Civil Liberties Union (Crouch, Rozell el. at. 2017).

Another case of voter suppression inUnited States occurred when David Krupa, in 2018, opted to run for alderman of the 13th Chicago Ward against his opponent – Quinn Marty. For him to be in the ballot, he had to file 473 signatures valid of the residents of the Ward. He filed in 1700 instead. He was revoked as residents signed an affidavit (Hill, 2018).

In conclusion, United States voter’s suppressions like the strict law IDs intended to restrict the minorities from accessing the voting rights, the Jim Crow Laws were a form of suppression of voters, Presidential Advisory commission by Donald Trump and many others. I would recommend that strong commissions be set up to prevent voter fraud and prevent election frauds too.