What stage of Piaget’s development are the children in this video in? Give some evidence (other than the children’s age) to support that children are functioning in this stage. Is this a good way to teach children in this age group? Why or why not?
Children development is one of the most considerable roles which parents, guardians as well as teachers should undertake carefully during the kid’s growth period. Precisely, teaching and motivating them to love one another irrespective of their eye colour skin colour as well as the country of originality is one of the roles that lay an excellent background toward their development. Mostly, it’s wise to choose tender age children, for instance, from the video teacher Jane Elliot picked lower grade level children (grade three). It’s an evident scenario that she chose the lower grade level, because, at this age, many children tend to be more emotional and can react without reasoning. For example, two boys fought because of teasing one another in regards to eye colour that is blue verses brown eye superiority.
However, I can suggest teaching children life concept at this tender age is a noble thing, as wise saying “it’s possible to shape a tree when it’s young” the same concepts applies here. At this tender age, you can impact good traits that they will adopt throughout their lifetime, for instance, it’s evidently proven from the video that whatever Jane Elliot taught the grade three kids they still practice till to date. Besides, the whole idea needs care while tackling it. Don't use plagiarised sources.Get your custom essay just from $11/page
How do you see self-fulfilling prophecy and learned helplessness portrayed in this video?
From the video, Jane Elliot gave all she had to increase diversification knowledge of reducing racism among her class children. However, the prophecy comes true to only a group which had an idea of the eye of the storm concept “that argues, blue eyes and brown eyes are equal hence should be treated with fairness. The learning may not reveal much help since other people may not have accessed the information; thus, they will still practice racism at a higher level. Notably, there is a scene where one of Elliot’s student happened to be teased because of playing with a black person, and the act made that kid (girl) feel bad because of discrimination in his society.
How was the self-esteem of the children affected by participating in this study? Why do you think the children’s test scores rose after participating in this experiment?
At the first scene, the self- esteem of children went down because the brown eye population were subjected to be inferior as compared to blue eyes children. In the second day, the case was opposite “now the inferior children were the one with blues eyes” this lead to a lot of conflict and prejudice among the children. However, after a clear understanding of the concept, children began to learn that they are all equal irrespective of colour differences which made even they esteem to rise. After acknowledging each other, the students started studying together happily, which made the score to grow since they could help each other without prejudice.
Give an example of how operant conditioning, classical conditioning and social observational learning were shown in this video. Be specific in your discussion. For the discussion of classical conditioning, please write out the process.
In the video, the operant condition reveals itself video when Jane subject children into the eye of the storm concept. Elliot subject blue eyes as superior as compared to brown eye children the action make the brown to feel bad. In the next day, she gives a task, and brown-eyed people did well ad at this point she subject again brown eyes are superior to blue. Then all sudden she asked them how did they feel when they are termed as inferior, and they said that it’s not a good feeling; however, the condition makes them comply not hating or prejudicing other groups because of their colour. Whereas, classical conditioning happens when children are conditioned to have a sense that every person is the same as them. However, the stimuli condition reveal itself in the area where the kids are engaging themselves cheerful because the teacher is in class. Later the students are able to exercise the loving act and playing with other kids of any race without any surveillance, and this act fulfils the neutral condition in the classical conditioning theory.
How can you use Piaget’s theory and Kohlberg’s theory to explain the different reactions of the adults and children during this study?
During personal development which start from birth till adulthood, it involves different stages where people tend to react in accordance to what teacher and parents teach them. The video shows that kids tend to respond mostly positive toward what Elliot taught them and also the scene can be observed by the adult at green collection facility when Elliot visited them for the training. However, as part of society, I should engage in teaching children and adult using an experiment that has a positive impact since they will react to it till old age and even place of work.
Which theory (theories) of personality can help us understand the behavior of the students in this video? Support your answer with a strong discussion of that theory.
Allport’s theory is one of the approaches that have a stable foundation explanation about personality. However, Allport supports that biological personality is mostly influenced by our birth as well as surrounding experiences. Concerning the video, it’s a clear indication that children inherit actions from teacher and parents positively. For example, the kids tend to hate black people since they found that myth from their parent since they were born. After several experiment and briefing from their teacher “Jane Elliot,” the children got a motivation that they should treat and play with others because no one is better than the other. Also, from the class of Dutch where the majority of the class members are black people, we can see there is excellent interaction as the students inherited the superb trait of not judging other people by their race. Therefore, there is a significant need to enrich our children and member of society with motivational personality. While doing so, we shall diversify the whole universe to be a sister and brotherhood place of living.