woes of the American movie producer Harvey Weinstein
The article talks about the woes of the American movie producer Harvey Weinstein as faces jail term after the New York court found him guilty of sexual assault and rape-related charges. The article reports that after over ninety women came forward accusing Weinstein of rape and using his position to solicit sexual favors from them and also assault the women. The New York prosecution initiated multiple charges and trials to ascertain such allegations. The ninety women were part of the #MeToo movement that gave them the courage and audacity to face the one’s powerful and influential movie producer. However, despite the courts proving the validity of these claims through witness testimonies, the exact timeframes when such sexual assault ordeals took place remain undefined. Some instances spun to over two decades or less, and the longer instances did not stand the threshold for sufficient proof. The article further adds that the sexual assault did not only take place in the US but also involved multiple Canadian actresses. The sexual assaults and rapes ordeals arose from Weinstein’s habit of forcing himself on the actresses as a bribe before they are assigned acting roles. In that regard, Weinstein would ask the actresses for sexual favors in turn of being assigned multiple roles in a movie. Those women who refused his sexual advances got raped and subsequently got coerced not to report owing to the power he wielded.
The message that the author of the article sent to the readers is that regardless of mighty an individual could be during his glory days when their day to face justice reaches, their fall from grace to grass is humbling. Thus, using Weinstein as a typical example, the author highlights the consequences of such criminal activities through an individual’s misuse of power. Such acts go punished when the hands of justice finally strike an individual. Thus, regardless of one’s status and position in society, engaging in criminal activity would eventually translate to punishment at some point.
According to the article, the author seemingly opines that there should be no mercy to sexual predators who use their positions and power they wield to commit crimes against individuals. In the article, the author sarcastically mocks Weinstein’s accomplishments in the movie industry by highlighting that there were no Oscars in the courtroom but instead his big day with justice. The closing remarks of the article further urge people not to cry for Weinstein, a clear show of the feelings of the author towards the disgraced movie producer.
The two articles have shared them of sexual assault perpetrated by Weinstein against the unsuspecting or hapless actresses who wanted to cut in the entertainment industries. The theme of sexual assault has seemingly rattled the authors in the two articles, and their collective praise for Weinstein’s potential sentencing attests to that.
Contrastingly, the article in the Toronto Sun manifests through a biased editorial that is purely grounded on an author’s feelings towards Weinstein. The second article in the star.com proves to be very objective on such issues. The article in star.com provides a more in-depth insight into the events that led to the whole Weinstein issue as opposed to the Toronto Sun that rides on the personal opinion of the author rather than objective reporting.
When comparing the two articles, the article in the star.com stands out immensely. The article provides the readers with an objective and more in-depth insight regarding the whole issue, giving them a platform to draw learning lessons. However, the article in the Toronto Star rides on a preconceived notion, and its subjectivity makes it harder for the audience to have less platform for personal conclusions regarding multiple issues.
Contextually, the viewpoints of the authors have relatively similar aspects that do not only make them relevant but also effective. Save for the degree of objectivity. The articles highlight the essential and shared theme that immensely affected actresses in different ways. However, the author in Toronto Star relies on a personal perspective rather than facts associated with the whole case.