Workers are more inclined to work at home
Workers are more inclined to work at home. But the main question is, does working from home affect performance and productivity? Let’s have a look at both of them.
Working in the office
Some companies are still rigid that office workforce enhances motivation and, therefore, high productivity. Companies that practice open office layout tend to hold more on office workforce. This is because they enjoy economies of scale, which is characterised by low office overhead costs. According to workplace analytics, work redesigning is creating a more cost effective and productive workplace for workers.
The majority of United Kingdom workers still operate in a traditional office. Your pretty familiar with an open space, with a water cooler, and access control room and windowless cubicles. While technology advancement makes remote working feasible, companies still want to keep their employees on site. There are disadvantages of remote workforce and equally several advantages of the office workforce.
Should companies allow their employees to work from home? After all, we are in the digital age, where you only need to compose and email and receive an email confirmation to show that your email was received. Technology advancement presents significant communication channels. However, with all these communication options at hand, companies still hold to the same old reasons for making employees commute to the workplace. Why are companies not eliminating commute time, overhead costs, and office space?
Are remote workers reliable and productive? Many business people and managers still doubt that workers can maintain the same morale when working at home. Indeed managers have a reason to doubt. A face to face meeting triggers an intellectual argument that produces creative ideas, leads, and referrals.
Also, on-site workers are likely to develop a comprehensive understanding of their duties in the company. They will also submerge themselves in the organization culture, therefore, showcasing a professional demeanor.
Remote workforce
Despite that some employers still believe employees lack motivation when working from home, a significant number of employees is advocating for the flexibility of working from home. They feel that, to a great extent, working from home is productive.
Remote working requires a manager to consistently supervise a worker who is not in the office. Most managers find it challenging to supervise workers who are in a remote position. The situation can be more daunting if there is poor communication between the manager and employees.
Luckily, with the tremendous advancement in technology, supervisors can seamlessly communicate with remote workers. All they need is a security camera install to enable teleconferencing. The only thing many organizations fear is whether a remote worker will actually be working. A remote worker can work on some reports and send them via email or dropbox, among others. The crucial thing is trust and competency. A remote work must be responsible enough to attend to his duties with minimal supervision.
Why balance is best
After evaluating both options, you will find that neither extreme is best. Both types of workers can be productive if well supervised. Furthermore, even omnichannel marketing withstood heightened competition due to creativity.
The general consensus is to allow workers to work both remotely and at the office. If a worker works remotely for three days a week, he will have a better chance to balance between personal issues and work. The main question should be which space provides greater focus. An employee can be physically present in an office, but his focus is always interrupted. Therefore, a productive space is one that offers maximum concentration and comfort.
Digital drive will continue stirring the workplace arrangement, and many people will want to work remotely. Another significant advantage of working remotely is that you can work for multiple companies. After all, the main thing is never to compromise the quality of output.