Workplace harassment
Abstract.
Workplace harassment is covered by the Rhode Island statute Title 10, Chapter 3 describing the manner of Alternative dispute resolution in the process of deliberating on defamation. The panel selected relies on the Ohio Risk Assessment System (ORAS) in assessing the presence or manifestation of criminal behaviour by defendant John Doe charged for defaming Sally Park at the workplace. The plaintiff suffered emotional harm and injury without damage and tendered a complaint to the human resource in line with workplace code of conduct. The human resource was instructed to notify relevant administrative agencies, leading to arrest of John Doe for defaming and intent of malice on a colleague Sally Park. The liability of the defendant is evident upon violation of 9 U.S. Code § 2. Validity and irrevocability of agreements, including workplace rules and regulations through harassment in the form of defamation. The plaintiff suffered injury without defamation, thus eliminating the reliance on classifying workplace harassment as a capital offence.
The 9 U.S. Code Title 9—ARBITRATION offers the defendant and plaintiff the opportunity to devise internal conflict resolution schemes (Code of Ethics For Professional Communicators IABC, 2014). Through consideration of workplace ethics and the criminal history of John Doe, the arbitration panel passes a judgement condemning defamation on Sally Park. It warns the defendant to avoid further instances of workplace harassment. However, professional ethics dictate formal behaviour and avoiding infringement or trespass to a colleague’s personal space. As such, John Doe is guilty of trespassing the personal space of Sally Park per Rhode Island statute Title 10, Chapter 3 describing the manner of Alternative dispute resolution. In the case of defamation complaint by Sally Park by the defendant John Doe, convening a panel for internal dispute resolution is suitable in deliberating liability and process of indemnity for the plaintiff.
IABC’s Code of Ethics through ORAS framework process recommends the defendant John Doe to observe Rhode Island- Title 10, Chapter 3 dictating proper behaviour and adherence to code of conduct at the workplace (Wex, n.d.). Furthermore, ORAS is sufficient in linking neighbourhood problems that predispose John Doe in defaming and being overtly hostile towards the plaintiff Sally Park and proposes subsequent arrest and jailing upon further altercation. However, the arbitration panel opts to protect the welfare of the defendant John Doe due to the absence of substance abuse, and lack of criminal behaviour in the previous four years. Safeguard the welfare effects under The 9 U.S. Code Title 9—ARBITRATION translates in affirming to the plaintiff of their security, and statutory punishment on the defendant in the form of a restraining order.