This essay has been submitted by a student. This is not an example of the work written by professional essay writers.
Uncategorized

Origami Heart Training Plan: Academic Summary

Pssst… we can write an original essay just for you.

Any subject. Any type of essay. We’ll even meet a 3-hour deadline.

GET YOUR PRICE

writers online

Origami Heart Training Plan: Academic Summary

Honey and Mumford’s learning style was used in coming up with the training plan. This is because the topic is practical, and it requires learning, observation, and constant practice to achieve the objective of the training. In arriving at the aims and purposes, the method of C-SMART is vital. The purpose and goal of the training were challenging at a reasonable level. Training objectives and targets were clearly defined, and what was expected of the trainees was clearly stated. Demonstration of what was required of them was well put in the video. The goal to be able to learn how to make an origami heart was achievable within a reasonable timeframe. At the end of the training program, there is a need to access and evaluate what the trainees have learned. By understanding what the parties have learned during their period of training, it will determine how evaluation is done during and at the end of the practice.

The LSQ model has been heavily used in the field of applied management to improve training and education (Duffy & Duff, 2002). The learning style further increases learning in the organization, and more also improves factor analysis and validity (Swailes & Senior, 1999). The model is very reliable, and it helps to measure inventory in learning. Testing of the model has further proven that it is effective in meeting objectives and extracting learning styles (Penger, 2009). The learning style questionnaire has been effective in the management of knowledge, and it increases learning styles (Hayes & Allinson, 1988).

Bibliography

Duffy, T. & Duff, A., 2002. Psychometric properties of Honey & Mumford’s Learning Styles Questionnaire (LSQ). Personality and Individual Differences, 33(1), pp. 147-163.

Hayes, J. & Allinson, C., 1988. The Learning Styles Questionnaire: An Alternative to Kolb’s Inventory. Journal of Management Studies, 25(3), pp. 269-81.

Penger, S., 2009. Testing Dunn & Dunn’s and Honey & Mumford’s learning style theories: The case of the Slovenian higher education system. Management: journal of contemporary management issues, 14(2), pp. 1-20.

Swailes, S. & Senior, B., 1999. The dimensionality of Honey and Mumford’s learning styles questionnaire. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 7(1), pp. 1-11.

 

 

  Remember! This is just a sample.

Save time and get your custom paper from our expert writers

 Get started in just 3 minutes
 Sit back relax and leave the writing to us
 Sources and citations are provided
 100% Plagiarism free
error: Content is protected !!
×
Hi, my name is Jenn 👋

In case you can’t find a sample example, our professional writers are ready to help you with writing your own paper. All you need to do is fill out a short form and submit an order

Check Out the Form
Need Help?
Dont be shy to ask