Clinical Research and Quality Improvement

Clinical Research and Quality Improvement

Introduction

Quality improvement (QI) in the healthcare sector means constant and incorporated attempts of caregivers, clinicians, patients, and close families, as well as the researchers in a healthcare facility, to make transitions that lead to improvement of patients’ health, care systems as well as improving healthcare professionalism. On the other hand, clinical research is an element in the health care sector and medicinal studies that tend to give rise to the enlightenment which is valuable in the interpretation of human diseases, preventions and treatment of illnesses hence leading to the promotion of human health (Ommaya, Korn and Tunis, 2002).

Differences between Clinical Research and Quality Improvement

Quality improvement in health care sectors focuses on improving particular aspects of healthcare deliveries or health, which isn’t executed consistently and adequately currently. However, clinical research intends to identify certain theories to invent contemporary knowledge or improve existing enlightenment. Clinical research recognizes particular scientific knowledge gaps in the literature, while quality improvement explains the seriousness and essence of a particular present situation and the tended situation. In quality improvement procedures of interventions and transitions are anticipated to take place over time while in clinical research, there are particular protocols to be followed. These protocols define how the interventions and interactions will take place and utilize the gathered information and specimens.

Importance of Understanding the Difference between QI and Clinical Research

Clinical nurses need to understand the contrast between clinical research and quality improvement. It helps them in determining whether or not particular projects qualify to be a clinical study or quality development. The understanding of these differences also enables the nurses to prepare adequately in addressing ethical considerations and ensuring the implementation of particular regulations.

Benefits and Challenges of Instrument Implementation

The research instrument was beneficial since it accurately determined the purpose, methodologies, and the tended benefit of the proposals. The tool also provides transparency in categorizing, evaluating, and discussing the projects. It can differentiate among clinical investigations and quality advancement activities for plans. However, the implementation of this instrument is challenging since it is not the absolute adjudicator for deciding if a project is a clinical research or a quality implementation.

Establishment of a Formal Process to Monitor QI activities Involving Human Subjects

Official procedures are supposed to be created to observe quality advancement activities, especially if the examinees will be involved, humans. The lives of the human subjects are essential, and therefore careful monitoring should take place since it will ensure that the patients’ need is strictly taken care of and that they get high quality services. It will also ensure that the transitions take place affectively and that no harm occurs to the patients’ health. In case the changes bring a negative impact on some of the subjects, the formal monitoring procedure will help to recognize these issues early and ensure they are solved swiftly.

Conclusion

Quality improvement and clinical research are essential in the health care sectors. As much as their processes differ, they all aim to improve the health of the patients. However, nurses need to differentiate among the two projects. The research instrument is essential since it makes it easy to recognize the difference between clinical studies and quality advancements by analyzing their activities.