Reading Response 7: Race, Racism, and Radicalized Discourses
In the paper, the race is recognized as the act of favoring individuals or a community of a particular color. In anthropology, racism is an essential part of the study, and for that reason, this response paper intends to address racism and radicalized discourses. In many cases, regions are occupied with people from different races with different cultural backgrounds. When an anthropologist is in the field, they face people of diverse colors and social believes. However, it is their responsibility to accommodate every color for the mission to be a success (Scheper, 2005). In another view, racial discrimination is shown as a way of treating a group of people different from others because they belong to specific groups. Racial discrimination is one of the factors that influence a lot in anthropology work and entire beliefs. It involves treating a particular community as a minor with few advantages and privileges as others.
I think that the area of race and racism is well-covered in the article as the author provides insight into the meaning of race and what racism involves. The merits and demerits are also discussed in detail as the reader’s attention is brought the light of race. As proposed by the author, radicalized discourses are a result of the practice of racism and racial discrimination. I believe that the author of the paper has extremely exhausted all dimensions of racism and its disadvantages. In a nutshell, the author has comprehensively covered racism in relation to anthropology. I strongly think that there is a significant correlation between race and anthropology as the writer forwards.
References
Scheper-Hughes, Nancy. 2005. Katrina: the disaster and its doubles. Anthropology Today 21, no. 6: 2-4.