Productivity paradox

Productivity paradox

Productivity paradox is the peculiar observation created in the business process examination that as more investment is created in data innovation, worker productivity may go down instead of up. The current thinking of productivity paradox is based on further discussion on productivity and technology. There are vast conflicts among productivity and technology because we provide priority to productivity, and we gain high output by incorporating modern technology. The productivity paradox indicates that as new information technology is presented to the business process, there is an attempt for work productivity to reduce. This perception entails the encouragement for technology that is supposed to add on the productive competencies. These viewpoints to support the paradox were made about the process, and productivity analysis made on the 1970s focus automation of business processes that haven’t yielded productivity and, at times, have been observed as the cause of process lags.

The current thinking of productivity paradox is that many managers’ information technology investments to assist in streamlining processes and keep things moving along. Through this, they usually purchase new equipment transfer systems to new serves and move to new software often with productivity in kind. The evaluation of productivity paradox in business and have shown that it has not become evident as a result of high levels of information literacy as well as access to applications that accommodate for culture, language, and climate of local business. The experience has demonstrated that one of the most efficient means of eliminating lags in productivity is in the growth of technology infrastructures that considers users and demands growth of challenges and applications.