Ganor Boaz’s claim
My theoretical framework for this assignment is Ganor Boaz’s claim that “of the several categories of non-conventional terrorism, biological terrorism is extremely challenging to plan in addition to performing. If non-conventional terrorism is to transpire in the anticipatable future, nuclear terrorism is likely to be used against civilians.” I will use Ganor’s assertion as my theoretical framework to analyze whether his claim is compatible with my findings in this case study.
In my opinion, biological terrorism is the type of non-conventional extremism that is most challenging to plan in addition to performing. The definition of biological extremism is the usage, and propagation of biological arms in inhabitant centers through several means to cause numerous, and morbidity causalities (De Cauwer et al., 2017). Biological weapons are not accessible, available, and conventional as compared to nuclear and chemical weapons. The two critical sources of biological weapons include home fabrication and purchase or acquisition from independent states. Home-produced biological weapons necessitate the usage of complicated biological resources of different types and laboratories that are not available to terrorist organizations.
If non-conventional terrorism is to transpire in the anticipatable future, nuclear terrorism is most likely to be used against civilians. Nuclear terrorism uses fissionable radioactive materials in a terrorist attack (Weiss, 2015). In this case, extremist organizations prerequisites not to develop, gain control, or acquire nuclear bombs to cause widespread damage. They requisite to use conventional arms counter to nuclear reactors, immensely damage the reactors, thus discharge radioactive substance into the atmosphere to jeopardize large populace centers.
Nuclear weapons give extremist organizations substantial advantages, primarily because they perpetrate massive numbers of fatalities in addition to commanding global media attention. Furthermore, since it is problematic to judge a terrorist organization’s intimidations to utilize nuclear weapons. Therefore, nations may find themselves vulnerable to extremist extortion under the intimidation of nuclear attack. Consequently, they find themselves entangled deprived of knowing how probable the terrorist can conduct their threat.
The extremist organization might try to acquire nuclear bombs or fissionable materials in numerous ways. They might procure fissionable material on the black market, which has developed in parts of Eastern Europe. The black market facilitates the smuggling of fissionable materials and equipment for creating atomic bombs for terrorist organizations.
Furthermore, a terrorist organization might obtain or purchase nuclear bombs from states, precisely a country that supports terrorism (Gale & Armitage, 2018). Several revolutionary states are acknowledged to be sympathizers of various terrorist organizations. These countries reserve considerable resources and make a massive investment in obtaining nuclear capacity hence striving to develop an atomic bomb.
Finally, my finding indicates that biological terrorism is exceptionally challenging to plan in addition to performing. Nuclear terrorism is likely to be used against civilians since a terrorist organization might attempt to obtain nuclear bombs or fissionable materials in numerous ways. They might procure fissionable material on the black market, which has developed in parts of Eastern Europe. My conclusions are, therefore, compatible with my chosen theoretical framework for this assignment.