Peer Review for Primary Source Analysis
Peer review refers to the evaluation of work, and it acts as a filter to make sure that only high-quality research gets published by determining the significance, originality and validity of the study. In Peer Analysis 1 (Chapter 3), The introduction includes a thesis that represents the writer’s argument because the writer relates to the main idea of the paper. The writer explains how Chinese and Mediterranean had ordered in society and live a good life. He also explains the political values that each one of them possesses. Every paragraph in this analysis begins with a topic sentence which summarizes the main idea of the article and each section is well organized. The overall rate of each paragraph is as follows. (Scale 1-5, 1= Least structured and 5=Most structured). Paragraph one – 5, Paragraph two -5, Three – 3 and paragraph 4- 4. Don't use plagiarised sources.Get your custom essay just from $11/page
In Peer Analysis #1 (Chapter 6)), The introduction includes a thesis that represents the writer’s argument since the reader gets to know what to expect from the analysis. There is a clear explanation about two kingdoms, “Chinese and Roman” who shared a common trait which is the importance of the military in the society. They believe that the success of the empire was dependent on military success. Every paragraph in this analysis begins with a topic sentence which summarizes the main idea of the article and each paragraph is well organized. The overall rate of each paragraph is as follows. (Scale 1-5, 1= Least structured and 5=Most structured). Paragraph one – 5, Paragraph two -4, Paragraph three – 4 and paragraph 4- 5.
Guided questioning can help to improve the overall quality of primary Source Analysis. Well-crafted questions aids in generating discussion, promote comprehensive exploration of subject matter and lead to new insights, (Paltridge, 2017). Some helpful recommendations to improve the overall quality of the analysis. The researcher should have a comprehensive background to comprehend the complexities and depth of the source fully, and this will give a strong foundation for study.
Also, there is little information in data presentation, and the researcher should make amendments to increase the overall quality.
References
Paltridge, B. (2017). The discourse of peer review: Reviewing submissions to academic journals. Basingstoke, England: Springer.