Response to Claudia

Response to Claudia

It is crucial that you have been able to differentiate between a scholarly article and a non-scholarly article. From your research, you have fully justified why you have considered your references as scholarly articles. Orth, et al. (2019), obtained from the Walden Library, which measures four different outcomes on a five-point Likert scale ranging from adequacy, ability to meet resident needs, coordination/collaboration, and availability, fully satisfy the qualities of a scholarly source. The article was peer-reviewed, its authors’ credentials were provided and, it was recently edited, having been edited in June 2019.

The second article, which you obtained from the internet, talked abouthow the current treatments and models of health care do not address the complexity of mental health illnesses. It then proposes radical changes in the practice of mental healthcare, including training for clinicians and a way of developing new research methods (Lake, 2017).You found that it also had several recommendations that were made for an internal research program aimed at investigating the efficacy of alternative medicine. The most important fact is that you found this article to be scholarly. It not only had the credentials of its authors but also had peer-reviews. It was also published in August 2017, showing that it had been recently verified. Other works had also cited the article, thus being validated as a scholarly article.

As you’ve stated, it is necessary to usepeer-reviewed sources to be sure of what you are writing in your scholarly assignments. This ensures that whatever you write is accurate and reliable in your field of study, and helps in fulfilling the purpose of the writing..