Is Trait Selection Frivolous or Unethical?

Is Trait Selection Frivolous or Unethical?

I agree with any scientist who claims that trait selection is unethical and strongly disagree with those who purport that the whole idea is frivolous. Even though trait selection is associated with specific unethical issues, it is a necessary procedure that enhances human characteristics and helps to control the resurgence of genetic disorders in subsequent generations. The idea is, however, unethical because it could severely affect fetal development in unexpected ways or cause long-term effects that have not been discovered and established yet. Dr. Steinberg’s critics are likely to with the struggle in line with the theory of utilitarianism, which demands that the choice that confers many benefits to many people should be adopted in an ethically controversial situation. Even though choosing trait selection would improve human characteristics, the challenges associated with the method are more adverse.

2. Deontological versus Teleological Approach

The deontological theory, which is the fundamental basis of the deontological argument, requires individuals to adhere to their duties and obligations when involved in an issue that requires decision-making and is accompanied by ethical controversies. A teleological approach, on the other hand, disregards the requirements of the deontological technique and suggests that a decision should be made based on the effect a particular goal would have on the majority of the people. On the issue of trait selection, the two approaches seem to pull in the opposite direction. While the deontological approach is used by Dr. Steinberg’s critics to prompt him to comply with his medical duties and obligations, the respective doctor uses the teleological approach to affirm that the world is dynamic and requires trait selection to enhance human life. The doctor is so obsessed with gene therapy that he pays little regard to its untold consequences.

3. How Sex Selection would devalue certain Groups

The use of sex selection, if left uncontrolled, would severely affect the poor and the middle class, while giving the wealthy class an advantage. Even though I am not damn sure about it, the sex selection procedure would be very expensive and only affordable to the rich. The wealthy individuals would, therefore, select the best traits for their offspring, leaving the poor to continue struggling. Due to the high costs involved, the procedure would only be accessible to a few individuals, which contradicts the demands of the utilitarianism theory. Equally, the adoption and practice of the procedure would create disparities in human rights, which is against the doctrine of fairness. This theory requires that all people are provided with equal rights. Sex selection would, therefore, be a rich man’s business.