Validity and Reliability as Applied in Survey Research

Validity and Reliability as Applied in Survey Research

Validity and even reliability are two concepts that are used to assess the research’s quality. They show excellently how a test or even a method measures something. Research reliability is concerned with the measure’s consistency, while validity concerns the measure’s accuracy. It is, therefore, essential for one to consider the two concepts when creating their research design, planning their techniques, and also writing up their outcomes, particularly in the quantitative investigation. Reliability and even validity are closely similar or connected. However, they mean various things. An evaluation or calculation can be reliable and not be valid. On the other hand, a valid or accurate measurement is usually reliable as well.

Reliability defines how constantly a technique measures things. If an equal outcome can be persistently accomplished by applying the same approaches under identical situations, then the measurement or calculation is seen as reliable. For example, a person can measure the liquid sample’s temperature many times under identical or unchanging conditions. The thermometer shows an unchanging temperature always, which means the outcomes are reliable. Another example is whereby a doctor makes use of a symptom survey in diagnosing a patient who has a continuing or lifelong medical condition. Several various doctors also use an identical questionnaire with that same patient. The doctors, however, present different diagnoses, which is an indication that the symptom questionnaire has decreased reliability as a condition’s measure.

Validity describes how accurately an approach measures something that it is destined or expected to estimate. If an investigation has a high or soaring validity, it means that it gives results that tally or resemble the factual properties, variations, and also characteristics within the social or even physical world. High or soaring reliability is one key indicator or sign that shows that a measurement or calculation is valid. If an approach or technique fails to be reliable, it is possibly not valid. For example, if a thermometer presents various temperatures every time, despite one carefully managing conditions, to make sure the heat of the sample remains the same, then there could be a possibility that the thermometer is malfunctioning. In such a case, the thermometer’s measurements are considered invalid. Another example is that if a symptom survey gives rise to reliable problem identification when it is answered at various times and by multiple doctors. In such a scenario, there is a clear indication that the survey has high or great validity as the medical condition’s measurement.

Validity is more challenging to evaluate as compared to the reliability, but it is additionally essential. For one to get beneficial results, the techniques used to assemble the information must be accurate or valid. The investigation needs to measure what it is expected to measure. Validity makes sure that an individual’s data’s discussion and also the conclusions that one draws are valid as well. Reliability is estimated or approximated via examining, in contrast, distinct versions of the identical measurement. The validity, on the other hand, can be approximated by examining, in comparison, the outcomes, with various essential data or even hypothesis.

References