Nationstate Insurance Case Study
The case study talks of Jane Denton, a chief information officer who has just been appointed at Nationstate Insurance company. Jane has shown quite a remarkable achievement in IT, and now at her new position, she intends to leave a lasting legacy before her retirement. The case study vividly describes Jane’s strategy in her conquest to achieve her goals. The paper describes the potential rewards that Nationstate Insurance would realize from the growth of an enterprise-wide architecture proposed by Jane. It also presents a business case that Seamus O’Malley, Jane’s chief enterprise architect, would hand over to the senior management team.
Potential rewards that Nationstate Insurance would realize
First, Nationstate Insurance would experience an efficient communication amidst various business units. Since the strategy aimed at centralizing the information, then several business units would experience quite an efficient communication that comes from a single location rather than from several points.
Secondly, the cost would be significantly reduced as redundancy would be eliminated. When information is centralized, then the repetition of documentation is eliminated. Additionally, the company would experience enhanced decision-making as more leaders of different business units are involved in various organization issues. Also, Nationstate Insurance would have an easy time in scaling and expanding as information would be accessed from a centralized location (McKeen & Smith, 2015).
The business case that Seamus O’Malley would hand over to the senior management team
Seamus needs to present a business case that completely aligns with the management goals as well as answers their fears. In this case, I believe that the following strategy would be of great help in Seamus’s position. The strategy is deploying a centralized system that gathers information at one point in the entire organization. The system must be employed using the best security techniques to avoid any data corruption or theft.
Next, Seamus must incorporate the business opportunities, risks, and mitigation approaches that will be used during the implementation of the new system as he presents to the management (Miller & Jones, 2017). Lastly, Seamus should retain his position as a senior architecture manager besides being the new chief enterprise architect. This will allow him to convince other managers on the benefits of the system since he, too, is willing to walk the same path.