Situated Knowledge and Universal Knowledge
The difference between these two types of knowledge is the variation between aspects of the globe that are linked to situation, background, identity, and understanding of the knower. Another difference is the contextualized acquaintance of certain events as well as universal generalizations unbounded by the circumstances that triumph in actual places and time. Scientists and philosophers believe that the only ideal knowledge is the universal type because it can be generalized. In other words, situated knowledge only serves a specific group of people while universal information serves dogma interest. Therefore, this research suggest that situational knowledge is ideal for Policing (Bittner). Situational data is essential in this field because it requires both experience and judgement which it offers
The ambiguity of practical purpose
Even though most people believe that formal logistic goals in life often render incomplete directions for front-line experts, it is practical in police departments. According Millgram (1977) people can find a meaning of an organization by looking into their actions. For instance, the police department one relates and understand that it is responsible for law enforcement because of its actions of solving crimes. However, an abstract statement cannot render a guide on police practices.
Conclusion
Thacher concludes that science serves human needs. However, there is no a one-size-fit all approach to all human interests. The police field has divergent interests therefore suitable research should focus on the police department and not on all human interests. He also insists on the use of situated knowledge to address front-line experts’ interests. Therefore, applying normative questions that results from actual situations is the best method to handle Policing issues and interests.
