Arguing Justified True Belief: A Notion of Knowledge
Justified True Belief is a theory that is meant to provide the necessary conditions that a person to be considered to have knowledge of something. The proposition seems to provide a solution to the question, “what defines knowledge?” According to the case, one must believe, and one’s belief must be true, and justified. In an attempt to analyze the insinuation of this solution, we have to understand each of the three rules presented. A belief is said to be the acceptance of the statement. It is also mentioned that a belief must be true and true in the accordance between a statement and its faculty. Alternatively, the extent in which it relates to the real world also matters. The last requirement is finding justification in a statement. For you to believe a statement is true, we must have reasons. The philosopher mentioned two ways that he thought would be used to provide justification _ logic, and empirical evidence. Logic uses methods of argumentation to prove that something is true. Logic uses principles and criteria of a valid interference. On the other hand, empirical evidence is a way of reasoning by senses and possible through experimentation and observation.
Gettier hold the focuses on epistemology, the study of knowledge and justified belief. Gettier also presents some problems and examples to back and counter this notion. One case brought by Gettier is one supposing two individuals, Smith and Jones, apply for a job. Then, suppose Smith has strong evidence that Jones will get the job and that Jones has 10 coins in his pocket. Also, the job’s president assured Smith that Jones would get the job. After that reassurance, Smith recounted the coins in Jones’ pocket; 10 coins were still there. With this evidence, Smith was justified to believe the man with 10 coins in their pocket will get the job. The Justified True Belief of this scenario presented by Gettier summarizes to: Smith believes the man with 10 coins in his pocket will get the job. Then, it becomes true the man who is hired does indeed have 10 coins in his pocket. Smith then was justified in thinking the man hired would have 10 coins in his pocket. With Gettier proposing this example, some problems do come about in questioning his argument and his cases. One flaw mentioned is how and if luck plays a role in Smith’s questioning of the 10 coins in the pocket when Jones was hired.
In conclusion, to find stability in Edmund’s cases is a challenge and without any real, knowledgeable solution, Justified True Belief is the only real answer to what truly is knowledge currently. With the summary of Justified True Belief and breakdown of Gettier’s first case, along with viable rebuttals to Edmund’s presentation, it is transparent to all that JTB is the most correct way in accepting knowledge. Justified True Belief’s three conditions of being believable, true, and justifiable – knowledge can be true knowledge.