You can buy an essay from us and relieve your academic stress
Av. Quality Score
Why Choose studygroom?
We not only promise a 24/7 support availability and timely delivery of all your papers. You also get a ton of other asuarances that our service comes with.
100% original papers.
The grade or money back.
We protect your privacy.
What is an article critique?
When we read an article, we should understand it and see what the author intended. However, the article might not be written in a way that is easy to read or follow.
That is where an article critique comes in. It provides the reader with a detailed overview of what they just read and provide feedback on what worked and didn’t work for them.
It is typically a written response to a piece of writing, which includes an evaluation and suggestions for improvement.
Intro: An article critique is an essay that analyzes the work of another person’s essay. It provides feedback on how to make it better and what problems may arise from this analysis. It can be used as part of the evaluation process for an English composition class or as part of a peer-review process. One student reviews another person’s paper before submitting it for publication.
How to critique an article: the main steps
Critiquing an article is a skill that is hard to master. There are several steps to doing it the right way.
You should start by reading the whole article. After that, you can skim through it for headings, sub-headings, images, graphics, and quotes. After that, review the article with questions in mind. You can ask them about any section of the article or ask about general things such as its tone or how it’s structured. Finally, you have to write down your thoughts on what works and what doesn’t work in this piece of writing.
Critiquing an article is a difficult process. It takes a lot of time and effort to read all the articles in a given time frame. To make this process easier, writers should follow these steps:
1) Read the article thoroughly
2) Identify the author’s main points
3) Write up your thoughts about each point, including why you think it is true or false and how it would be improved
4) Add any other key points that you might want to highlight.
5) Upload your thoughts on the article page.
This process is not just for one-time use – it can also be used as part of an authorship assessment that may happen periodically throughout your career.
How to critique a journal article
Professional journal articles need to be carefully evaluated. The first step is to decide what your goal is. Do you want to learn about the peer review process, improve your academic writing skills, or share the paper with colleagues?
Once you determine what you want from a critique, make sure you go into it with an open mind and good intentions. Keep in mind that critiquing is not objective and should never be done without considering the author’s work and intent.
Reviewing a journal article requires skills that not everyone has – such as a careful reading of the text, finding the main idea of a paper, and weighing evidence within a paper. A critique can help build these critical thinking skills for those who struggle with them.
Critiques help researchers improve their work and make it more impactful. They also help readers understand the strengths and weaknesses of the journal article, which helps them find potential flaws or use the article in new ways.
Many scholars might find that critiquing is tedious and time-consuming. This is why there are many tools available to help you review a journal article for critique purposes.
Here’s a list of tools that can be used for critiquing:
The first step to critiquing a journal article is to decide what qualities you want your critique to have.
In this section, we will discuss how to best critique a journal article so that the author can learn from it and take steps towards improving their work.
First, you should know what qualities you want your critique to have. A good critique should be well-written and organized. It should also provide specific points of improvement that come from a close reading of the paper and ideally includes citations for further research. This means that you need to know what kind of paper this is before starting your critique, which can be difficult if it’s an unknown journal or if it’s behind a paywall; however, there are some ways to find out more about the journal without knowing any specifics about it beforehand.
What to critique in a research paper?
When it comes to building an introduction for your research paper, there are some key components that you should always include to have a strong introduction. These are the following:
– The goal or purpose of the essay
– A summary of the paper
– The context of the paper
– Introduction of each section
There are three primary ways to critique the method:
1) Critique the study’s research design, including the following:
2) Critique the study’s implementation, including these issues: 3) Evaluate the appropriateness of the conclusions drawn from the data.
When it comes to research papers, you should focus on the topic and how good it is presented. That’s why in this section, we will be discussing how to critique the overall impression in a research paper.
Some of the things that you need to do when critiquing an overall impression in a research paper are:
– Pay attention to the introduction and conclusion
– Look out for errors and mistakes
– See if there is sufficient evidence or references provided.
The article “Ethics in American Public Administration: A Response to a Changing Reality” seeks to address current pressing issues such as climate change, immigration, among others. The article employs ethical lenses to address these issues.
Moreover, it recognizes the fact that American public administration ethics have not evolved in a vacuum. I agree with the author’s stand that administrative ethics have changed over a period due to being influenced by technology, legal, political as well as social forces. For this reason, I concur that ethics have not evolved through omission but rather have evolved by addition.
It is evident from the abstract that ethics have played immense roles in addressing some of the pressing issues in society. In the first paragraph, the article centers on how to approach various moral and normative questions in multiple organizations. In as much as the importance of ethics in public organizations has been addressed by other authors. This article stands out since it features particular ethical challenges and concerns that have not discussed in public administration. Indeed, the article is quite significant for the general administration students in identifying ethical problems and issues found in the twenty-first century. It is worth noting that today’s organizations experience challenges with moral and ethical principles. This is because there are increased cases of sexual assaults and sexual harassment of employees in public organizations. I feel that this article is quite useful in pinpointing these issues as well as addressing them for the common good of various stakeholders. This is with the reference of the previous statement asserted by the author that ethics helps in addressing multiple issues in the organization. Another point of reference is the fact that many people are aware of the emerging ethical challenges and concerns in the current world. Possibly, more problems have continued to appear because ethics evolve with various forces such as technological forces, social forces, political forces as well as legal forces. This implies that the past ethical challenges and concerns could have escalated in the twenty-first century.
The author is keen to trace how American public administration ethics have evolved. The author denotes that ethics have evolved into six main eras. These eras encompass reinventing government era, post-water gate era, civil rights era, post Second World War era, the progressive era, as well as the current era.
Interestingly, the progressive era developed the necessity for fighting corruption as well as establishing ways of improving the performance of the government. In my point of view, the period did not put much effort into fighting graft as well as improving government [performance. This is because corruption cases still exist in the current era despite the efforts put at first in fighting graft issues. With the author’s assertion that progressive reforms were meant to changing American public administration into a business-like or rather a professionalized endeavor. I concur with this statement; however, it did not bear fruit in the current federal administration.
Moreover, the author acknowledges the need for improving the performance of the organization by running the government the way business is managed or controlled. With this effect, it is clear that the author has not separated ethics from the performance. The author puts ethics play a significant role in solving various issues that affect the government, such as corruption and poor government performance. Indeed, ethics are essential in rationalizing the government. The authors bring in the idea about new public administration that was developed in the Civil Rights Era. He maintains that NPA was a means for making the government more responsive and more equitable to the societal diverse, and increasing demands. The author provides a new way through which public administration’s moral base can be injected through new civic virtues, benevolence, as well as values of equity. Concur with the author’s sentiments that new public administration brought in ethics into public administration. It is having mentioned that NPA was meant to make the government more responsive as well as equitable. I think NPA succeeded in making emphasis on the importance of ethics and social equity. The whole idea about ethics and government performance improvement can help public administration students determine whether ethics have succeeded in addressing various issues that exist in society. Conversely, an organization that a public administrator belongs to can as well complicate the roles of ethics in the public administration, leading to more challenges and issues being witnessed. This is because achieving equity in the current world has turned out to be problematic since public organizations are still experiencing ethical problems that have evolved over a period.
To sum up, I concur with the author’s point of view that that ethics have not evolved through omission but rather have evolved by addition. Ideally, the article has succeeded in addressing current pressing issues such as climate change, immigration, among others. The author in this article has highlighted and explained six eras through which ethics have evolved. On the other hand, ethical issues and concerns exist in public administration in the twenty-first century. To some extent, I feel that the previous era did not put much effort into fighting graft as well as improving government performance. This is contrary to the authors’ point of view. Generally, the article is useful since it provides an in-depth understanding of which the ethical issues can be identified in the organization.