Benjamin Powell
Benjamin Powell argues that despite the sweatshops exploiting workers by giving them fewer wages, the alternatives are worse. According to Powell, the productivity of the factory determines the compensation and wages of the workers. He points out that sweatshops bring physical capital and technology with them, thus raising productivity. Powell concludes his argument by advising on opening more sweatshops for the rapid development of the country and improvement on workers working conditions.
The author is credible because he demonstrates the alternatives of sweatshops, which indicate that sweatshops are better. He also shows what determines the wages and compensation a worker receives, to open our eyes, and see the importance of sweatshops. I can use Powell’s argument to discuss the reforms aimed at improving the workers’ condition in sweatshops and the contribution of sweatshops to our economy.
why the source is credible, identify what the position of the text is, and describe briefly the reasoning and support provided
Kliesen Kelvin. “Crossing Border: The Globalization Debate.” International Trade Exposure. St Louis. October. 2007. Web.
Kelvin L. Kliesen, argues globalization is crucial when it comes to economic growth, and goes ahead to highlight the pros and cons of globalization. According to Maddison, an economic historian, institutional and technological innovations, capital movements and international trade, and settlement of empty areas sustained economic advancement. According to Kliesen, free international trade is one of the benefits of globalization, which allows the country to specialize in beneficial activities. Free trade increases the number of goods and services that are produced worldwide. On the other hand, free trade creates more losers who are unable to compete with foreign manufacturers. As a result, there will be increased unemployment. Don't use plagiarised sources.Get your custom essay just from $11/page
The author is credible because he highlights both the downside and benefits of globalization. Also, Kelvin gives a conclusion on solving the issue of losers due to free trade. According to him, expanding the public programs to compensate the losers will help maintain a global economic system. I can use Kelvin’s debate to discuss the benefits and downside of globalization, as well as the solution to the downside.
Patrick Woodyard, the CEO and Co-Founder of Nisolo, talks about the effects of globalization on the US. According to Woodyard, globalization has brought cheap labor and materials in the country. Recently the cost of goods has gone down as well as the value and quality of those items. According to Woodyard, Bangladesh is an example of a country that offers cheap labor to attract foreign investors for major apparel companies. As a result, the economy grew fast, but the factories collapsed within some time. In such countries, the government allows cheap and child labor, resulting in poverty.
The author is credible because he uses real figures and examples to make his point clear on the effects of globalization. He also explains the steps that ought to be taken to realize change. I can use this talk, to explain the impact of globalization in society today and what ought to be done to slow it down.
Chang, Leslie. “The Voices of China’s workers.” Youtube.com. 12 September. 2012
Leslie T. Chang talks about the people who make the things we use every day. According to Chang, children are involved in making our smartphones, clothes, and every other thing we use. In return, we tend to exploit the victims with every purchase we make. According to her, the voices of the workers is what has been missing all along. Chang spent time with some of the workers and learned a lot from them, not forgetting their generosity. What the workers wish is to acquire more education and learn.
The author is credible because she makes us understand the effect of globalization by sharing a story about how she met and interacted with the producers or workers in the factories. I can use this talk to show how globalization exploited and silenced the workers and in return, favored those who use the products.
“Imagine the teenage farm girl who makes less than a dollar an hour stitching your running shoes, or the young Chinese man who jumps off a rooftop after working overtime assembling your iPad.”
“We, the beneficiaries of globalization, seem to exploit these victims with every purchase we make.”
“It is taken for granted that Chinese factories are oppressive, and Chinese suffering is appealing.”
Napoli, Robert Paul. “The Impact of Globalization on American Society.” 12 April. 2019.
Robert argues that globalization can either benefit some nations or hurt others. According to him, globalization is the foundation of international trade, economics, commerce, relations, and the livelihood of many people. It explains how the world has become interconnected and how these international relations have changed with time. Napoli explains how globalization has impacted the American lives regarding trade, jobs, politics, and livelihood.
The author is credible because he does not favor one side of globalization, but instead explains both the downside and benefits of globalization. He also advises considering globalization as a topic to be taught in schools to familiarize people with it. I can use this research to explain how globalization has changed the American lives both positively and negatively.
“This topic of globalization since the latter half of the 20th century is integral to American life and society, as it impacts the jobs individuals have, where their goods are made, and how their respective nations deal with others on an international level.”
“Globalization is the foundation of modern international relations, trade, economics, commerce, and livelihood for billions of people.”
“Globalization has had an immense impact on American life since 1945, regarding jobs, trade, livelihood, politics, geography, and goods, and must be thoroughly taught to all social studies students.”
Milanovic, Branko. “Global inequality: A new approach to the age of globalization.” 1st May. 2016.
Branko Milanovic argues that the description of the changes and drawing lessons on their implications are the objectives of the work on global inequality. He explains how global inequality changed in the past 25 years. Also, he shows how the income gaps between nations have evolved. Milanovic classifies migration, the national welfare state, citizenship, and citizenship rent as issues of politics and justice.
The author is credible because he provides graphical representations to bring out his idea of global inequality. He also shows the exact figure and percent to strengthen his research. I can use Milanovic reasoning to describe the outcome of worldwide inequality and explain the issues that arise as a result of this globalization.
Eriksen, Thomas Hylland. “Globalization.” Handbook of Political Anthropology. Edward Elgar Publishing, 2018.
Thomas Hylland Eriksen describes disembedding as the most appropriate definition for globalization. According to him, disembedding refers to ‘lifting out’ the social relations from the local contexts of interaction and their restructuring. Disembedding mechanisms in modern society are money, writing, standardized measurements, and clock time. Eriksen says that these mechanisms of transnational systems rely on communication technology and electronic information for efficiency.
The author is credible because he compares globalization to disembedding to bring out the real meaning of globalization. I can use this essay to explain the difference that exists between modernity and contemporary globalization of the nation-state. Also, I can use it to describe how nationalism is a product of the forces shaping globalization.
Alfandary, Peter. “The myth of globalization.” Youtube.com. May.2015. Aixen Provence France.
Peter Alfandary, an international layer, is fascinated with cultural differences in his talk on the global village. He talks about a real-life story that made him realize how different we communicate and how different we all are. According to him, village cultures and live still rules. Also, technology has affected cultural differences in one way or the other. He concludes that we are not global, and people need to have cultural intelligence to know that people don’t reason and think the same way.