Comparing Health Care Features from Other Countries with the US Health Care Model

Comparing Health Care Features from Other Countries with the US Health Care Model

 US health care system underscores a prominent cost and quality facing Americans today, presenting not only a top policy concern but also a primary indicator of economic efficiency that leads to the national debt. However, following the enactment of the affordable healthcare Act in 2010, there have been drastic changes in the US healthcare system in the reduction of the uninsured, affordability of the coverage, and expansion of healthcare (Baribault, &Cloyd, 1999). An analytical source of comparable statistics on the systems of healthcare provides an insight into the public and policymakers on the comparison of American health care systems with other countries. There has often been a comparison of the healthcare system in Canada and the United States made by public policy analysts, the government, and public health. The two countries, therefore, show almost similar healthcare systems in terms of complexities; however, following the changes in the Affordable Health Care Act (AHCA), the Canadian healthcare system has shown better health outcomes than the US.

Features of the US and Canadian Healthcare Models that have been Implemented by AHCA

            Both countries have, for a long time, had similar healthcare systems, albeit they now have different funding mechanisms. Canada has a single-payer healthcare system in its health act that requires full insurance of people devoid of copayments for all necessary medical hospitals. The US, on the other hand, uses a mixed public-private system, with most of its residents uninsured. The federal government of Canada provides healthcare support with strict adherence to the Canada health act.

That is coupled with its pubic coverage of both its private and public delivery. Instead of being part of the government, regional health authorities control Canadian hospitals and individual boards. The US healthcare, on the other hand, is limited to the military health system, Medicaid, Medicare, and the children of the state health insurance program. That covers the disabled, eligible citizens’ children (Carroll, & Frakt, 2017). However, most uninsured Americans who are available for the programs are unenrolled owing to both fiscal and political challenges. And the poor.AHCA has, therefore, come on board to implement such features through the evolution of healthcare systems, coupled with policies affecting governance models in the healthcare system. That is through the provision of local services and hospital constructions, funding of hospitals, and provision of subsidies on healthcare fees, service, and taxes. Additionally, AHCA has implemented the access to public health and insurance coverage to the two countries, s notion that had initially been a challenge.

From a sociological standpoint, such reforms are critical additions to the American healthcare system since owing to the class differences and socioeconomic positions as individuals have to fund theirs on healthcare insurance. Besides, healthcare insurance in the US is tied to employment, making those employed benefit from that insurance coverage as the unemployed suffer since they cannot benefit from the same. That is in contrast to Canada, where the government funds health care insurance following the Canada Health Act that ensured that the health care system finances all Canadian citizens with health insurance.

Features in the Canadian Model that are Different from the American Health Care System

            Unlike the US, whose health care model is based on a multiplayer and profoundly private system, the Canadian model is significantly based on a single-payer system that is heavily funded. That is making the US citizens suffer dissatisfaction in their healthcare systems as Canadian enjoy healthcare satisfaction among them, citizens. The model of healthcare in Canada cannot be implemented in the U system since US is very expensive and I determined in achieving profit in its treatment aspect that is driven by greed as compared to other countries like Canada that ha universal ace to publicly funded healthcare service that is fundamental to the national healthcare insurance for everyone in the country. The feature in the US healthcare system is more disadvantageous owing to more expenditure per person on healthcare provision as compared to other nations. That is coupled with insurance of the employed, leading to inequality in the least care system since the unemployed are forced to fund their health insurance coverage.

According to Reid, the moral choice that Americans have made regarding healthcare is socialized medicine. That means that the government takes full administrative role in the hospitals from ownership, employment of doctors and nurses, payment of bills, and buying medicine; hence the government maximizes its profits from the hospitals (Finchman, 2009). Unlike the US embracing socialized medicine, other developed countries are in agreement that every human has a fundamental right to health hence providing health care providers to their citizens at subsidized cost as compared to the US where healthcare is expensive. Those countries, unlike the U, provide universal healthcare coverage for their citizen. That has made more developed countries like Canada, Switzerland achieve better healthcare output than the US. Reid also underscored that the, unlike other nation that have adopted the model of Bismarck, Beverage and national health insurance for its clients, hence are still faced with the rising costs of the health care system leading to the country’ failure is to make health care viewed right a treatment of payment is weighed in the realm of the patients’ abilities to pay (Finchman, 2009)

Conclusion

The US spends more on health care services per person than other countries. Its comparison with Canada, for instance, underscores that the Canadian healthcare system I better since Canada has a strict that ensures universal treatment of its citizens to publicly funded health services., coupled with national insurance coverage on health for everyone in the country. That has led to a rise in  US healthcare inequality since healthcare treatment systems is determined by the citizens’ ability to pay, thus leading to an imbalance in terms of employment and class.

References

Baribault, M., & Cloyd, C. (1999).Health Care Systems: Three International Comparisons. Edge.  Retrieved from            https://web.stanford.edu/class/e297c/poverty_prejudice/soc_sec/health.htm

Carroll, A., &Frakt, A. (2017, September).The Best Healthcare System in the world. Which one   would You Pick? The New York Times. Retrieved from            https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2017/09/18/upshot/best-health-care-system     country-bracket.html

Fincham, J. (2009, November).The healing of America. A Global Quest for Better, Cheaper, and  Fairer Health Care. US National Library of Medicine, National Institute of Health.73      (1):17. Retrieved from https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2779642/