Comparison Analysis of Classical and Operant Conditioning
Whereas most individuals might believe that learning is typically a natural response that all animals are able, there is a more sophisticated explanation on how people learn the things they engage in to survive. Conditioning is the gaining of specific patterns of norms in the presence of well-described stimuli. Operant and classical conditioning are forms of learning. The use of illustrations helps to avoid confusion of the two notions in conditioning. Although classical and operant conditioning is similar, differences exist between them.
Similarities and Differences
Both classical and operant condition entails linking behavior and events in the environment of an organism and is shaped by the laws of association. For instance, it is easy to relate stimuli that are equivalent to one another, and that happens at the same periods. Classical conditioning is a form of learning whereby an organism learns to convey a natural response from one stimulus to the other. Pavlov’s Dogs is an experiment that helps to demonstrate classical conditioning (Zhang et al., 2019). Operant conditioning is a kind of learning whereby the probability of a norm is raised or lowered by the application of punishment or reinforcement. An instance of operant conditioning is evident when a dog might learn that, by sitting and remaining there, it will get a treat. If the dog responds well at sitting and staying there to obtain the treat express operant conditioning (Sakagami & Lattal, 2016).
However, operant and classical conditioning are different. In classical conditioning, the reaction is involuntary behavior while that in operant conditioning is voluntary. In operant conditioning, the behavior is new to the animal, and in classical conditioning, the stimulus is the one that is new to the animal. In classical conditioning, the response tends to follow the stimulus, whereas, in operant conditioning, the reaction leads the stimulus. In operant conditioning, the pleasurable reward results in repetition, whereas in classical conditioning, the link happens if the stimulus is enjoyable. Lastly, in classical conditioning, the pace of quantity of response measures the strength of conditioning, whereas, in operating conditioning, the production rate of norm gauges the strength.
Conclusion
In conclusion, operant and classical condition is similar to one another even though they vary in many ways. Both theories are consistent ways to teach a living thing to respond in a specific way. In both theories, there is a spontaneous recovery in organisms.