Concept of political responsibility and structural injustice

Concept of political responsibility and structural injustice

Introduction

Intrust for wrong, Irish Mario Young did offer an account of the structural injustices and the theory of responsibility for such structural injustices. The statement that she provided is introduced as the actual remand for discourses about the power that does focus on emphasizes the personal shortcomings of the less fortunate individuals. She did ignore the exact way in which the social structures within which they do act unfairly constrain the genuine opportunities that do exist for the poor in improving their practical life situations and standards. According to her proposals, structural injustices are harms that do come to us as a result of the architectural process in which most of the people do take part in. She argues out that most of the problem ha we as human do find ourselves in are as a result of the large scale structural problems.  The structural injustices, according to her, exist when the social processes put a group of people under a systematic threat of dominance or in over cases, deprive a group of developing or even exercising their capacities for others to dominate opportunities of developing or excising their authorities. The social, political, and environmental problems are a result of the own processes which we have created.

The concepts of structural injustices in an element concerning climate change do suggest that climate change is a result of our fundamental processes that do not protect the environment. However, since the structural methods put by other people mostly the government authorities, most civilians in the different people, across the world are not in position to have control over the elements of climate change as the various bodies given the power of controlling the or developing the process of structures process does it in the wrong way to have the much dominance over the different categories of the global population. We should, therefore, apply this concept with the motive of understanding how our problem starts and what is needed to end such problems.

Deforestation

According to structural injustice, we can understand that the element of climate change is a result of global deforestation or illegal logging, which is done to put the sparse population under the systematic threat of poverty. Since the impact of deforestation and hence he element of climate change, the structural injustice is formulated by those who have the ability to deprive the poor of the knowledge and the power of protecting the forests.   This structural injustice and political responsibility are placed on a given person in the society. However, such a person does not intentionally do what is right or is expected of them to eliminate the structure process that bar the people from engaging in the activities of deforestations. This helps us to understand why people continue cutting down rise and resulting directly to climate change globally. The concept of the structure responsibility in the can help us understand how we directly contribute to the problem of climate change globally

Destruction of water bodies

Young did suggest that the question that the world or which we collectively face is large scale structural problems. Climate change is a result of the destruction of water catchment areas. According to the suggestion by Young on the fundamental injustice and political responsibilities, most people’s action does the human water bodies’ destruction (structures process). None of these people are often interested in doing anything particularly reprehensible to causes the particular person to be unable to do anything cornering the conservation of water resources. As  result, this problem is likely to extend to some of our most pressing issues in life like food security and general poverty.  The concept of structural injustice helps us in the understanding of the fact that most of the problems that we face as a human being are as a result of the large and small scale interaction. Some of the political responsibilities which we have to bring to an end the so many problems we face from our actions such as this of climate change are due to lack of proper responsibility taking. This helps us understand the cause of the issue of climate change through water bodies’ destruction and how we can solve it

Industrialization

When we talk about climate change, then the element of manufacturing comes in. Most of us are complicated at some level in contributing to structural injustices. The structural inequities are produced and reproduced by large numbers of people who are acting with some Normal that has been accepted. For instance, in the issues of climate change that are caused by industrialization, the acceptable norm has been that it has been a normal and fair thing to release industrial waste or effluent to the atmosphere to create the climate change and no none of use does see this as a wrong thing.  The structural, therefore, can continue without any form of objection from people.   The element of industrialization, which is the leading cause of global climate change, can be attributed to the structural responsibility neglect by all of us. The result is a situation where everyone does believe that the industrial effluent emissions to the atmosphere are healthy.  The structural injustice here is vital in our understanding of our problem and how to solve it.

Conclusion

In applying Iris Mario Young’s concept of industrial injustice and political responsibility about the topic of climate change, it is key to understand how the problem of climate change is caused.  According to what is suggested by Young, the responsibly for justices and structural injustices do exist as a result of the social processes that put large categories of persons under some systemic threats of domination over their capacities. As such, through this model, we can understand what the root cause of our problem concerns the climate. Climate Change, according to the structural injustice and the fundamental process, it is possible to understand that our problem does begin with the extensive scale process which gives the other people the opportunities of improving their capacities of causing such problems. The concept helps in relating the understanding of the political responsibilities to our challenge and, most importantly, how structural injustice suggested by Young does result in our question, climate change.  The concept, therefore, helps us understand the origin of our problem and how possible is it to deal with the problem.